The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the statewide system of trauma care introduced in 2000 has resulted in improved survival for all major trauma patients in Victoria. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based cohort study using data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR), a registry of all hospitalised major trauma patients in Victoria. The study included major trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score > 15 captured by the VSTR between July 2001 and June 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The number of major trauma cases captured by the registry rose from 1153 in 2001-02 to 1737 in 2005-06. Adjusting for key predictors of mortality, there was a significant overall reduction between 2001-02 and 2005-06 in the risk of death for patients treated in the trauma system (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.48-0.80]). The reduced risk of death was also significant when road trauma cases (AOR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.39-0.80]) and serious head injury cases (AOR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46-0.83]) were analysed separately. The proportion of road trauma patients definitively treated at one of the three major trauma service (MTS) hospitals in Victoria rose by 7% over the 5-year period. Direct transfers from the scene of injury to MTS hospitals rose by 8% for all cases and 13% for road trauma cases over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a statewide trauma system was associated with a significant reduction in risk-adjusted mortality. Such inclusive systems of trauma care should be regarded as a minimum standard for health jurisdictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Changing the System - Major Trauma Patients and Their Outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008–17
Moran, C. G., Lecky, F., Bouamra, O., Lawrence, T., Edwards, A., Woodford, M., Willett, K., & Coats, T. J. (2018) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.07.001 · Cited by 384
Bernard, S. A., Nguyen, V., Cameron, P., Masci, K., Fitzgerald, M., Cooper, D. J., Walker, T., Std, B. P., Myles, P., Murray, L., et al. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181efc15f · Cited by 356
Self-citationPost Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: A Review of Therapeutic Strategies
Stub, D., Bernard, S., Duffy, S. J., & Kaye, D. M. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.988725 · Cited by 324
Defining major trauma using the 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale
Palmer, C. S., Gabbe, B. J., & Cameron, P. A. (2016) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.003 · Cited by 263
Self-citationThe effect of a nurse team leader on communication and leadership in major trauma resuscitations
Clements, A., Curtis, K., Horvat, L., & Shaban, R. Z. (2015) · International Emergency Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2014.04.004 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Cameron, P. A., Gabbe, B. J., Cooper, D. J., Walker, T., Judson, R., & McNeil, J.
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 546-550
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2359612212
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02176.x
- The paper
- Cameron, P. A., Gabbe, B. J., Cooper, D. J., Walker, T., Judson, R., & McNeil, J. (2008). A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival. Medical Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02176.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.