Cited by 36Dental Health and Care UtilizationGlobal Health Workforce IssuesDental Education, Practice, Research

"Sorry, I’m not a dentist": perspectives of rural GPs on oral health in the bush

Open access
Barnett, Tony, Hoang, Ha, Stuart, Jackie, Crocombe, Leonard·2016·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the provision of oral health and oral health service in rural areas from the perspective of general practitioners working in communities without resident dentists. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A qualitative approach using face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with 30 GPs from rural Queensland, Tasmania and South Australia, conducted between October 2013 and October 2014. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged from the interviews: rural oral health, managing oral health presentations, barriers to patients seeing a dentist, and improving oral health. Rural GPs saw patients with a range of oral health problems, including toothache, abscesses and trauma, and observed poor oral health in their communities. Some acknowledged that they were not confident when dealing with oral health problems; they typically provided short-term pain relief, prescriptions for antibiotics, and advised patients to see a dentist. Participants noted that rural patients may not see a dentist when advised to do so because symptoms had abated, oral health was regarded as a low priority, or the costs of travelling to and seeing a dentist discouraged them. The interviewees recommended building the capacity of GPs to better care for patients with oral health problems, establishing more effective communication and referral pathways between GPs and dentists, focusing on preventive dental care, and delivering dental services in more flexible and consistent ways that better meet the needs of the communities. CONCLUSIONS: Rural oral health could be improved by several approaches, including additional training for GPs in oral health care, primary prevention activities in communities, and improving the access to dental services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/mja15.00740

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients' problems seem to motivate confident practitioners to provide oral healthcare.

    “Patients’ problems seem to motivate confident practitioners to provide oral healthcare.”
  • Some publications reported that patients and most primary healthcare providers did not attribute value to continuity of care in oral health because oral health conditions are rarely life threatening.

    “Some publications reported that patients and most of the primary healthcare providers did not attribute value to continuity of care in the field of oral health because oral health conditions are rarely life threatening.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnett, T., Hoang, H., Stuart, J., & Crocombe, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Centre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS
Corresponding author
Hoang, Ha
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2016-01
Volume
204
Issue
1
Pages
26-26
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2480698121
Cited by
36
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
rural oral health, general practitioners, barriers to dental care, access to dental care, preventive dentistry, rural Australia, rural Queensland, Tasmania, South Australia
MeSH terms
Australia, Interviews as Topic, Oral Health, Patients, Rural Health Services, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review