Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metaverse Support Groups for LGBTQ+ Youth: An Observational Study on Safety, Self-Expression, and Early Intervention

Hasei, Joe, Matsumoto, Yosuke, Kawai, Hiroki, Okahisa, Yuko, Takaki, Manabu, Ozaki, Toshifumi·2025·Journal of Metaverse

Abstract

This study explored whether metaverse-based support groups could address social isolation and suicide risks among LGBTQ+ youths by providing enhanced anonymity, avatar-based self-expression, and improved accessibility. Over one year, 53 individuals aged 14–23 participated in regular online sessions facilitated via the "cluster" metaverse platform by a non-profit LGBTQ+ organization. Each 90-minute session included voice and text-based interactions within a specially designed single-floor virtual space featuring conversation areas and a designated "safe area" for emotional regulation. Post-session questionnaires (5-point Likert scales) captured demographics, avatar preferences, self-confidence, and perceived safety, self-expression, and accessibility; responses were analyzed with Pearson's chi-squared test and Mann–Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results indicated that 79.2% of participants selected avatars aligned with their gender identity, reporting high satisfaction (mean = 4.10/5) and minimal discomfort (mean = 1.79/5). Social confidence was significantly higher in the metaverse compared with real-world settings (p

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.57019/jmv.1639701

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hasei et al. (2025) found that in a metaverse support group study with 53 LGBTQ+ youth aged 14-23 in Japan, 79.2% of participants selected avatars aligned with their gender identity, reporting high satisfaction (mean 4.10/5) and minimal discomfort (mean 1.79/5).

    “In the metaverse support group study conducted by Hasei et al. (2025) with 53 LGBTQ+ youth aged 14-23 in Japan, 79.2% of participants selected avatars aligned with their gender identity, reporting high satisfaction with that choice (mean 4.10/5) and minimal discomfort (mean 1.79/5).”
  • Hasei et al. (2025) reached complementary conclusions to Meade et al. (2025).

    “The metaverse support group study by Hasei et al. (2025) in Japan reached complementary conclusions.”
  • The ability to present oneself in a VR environment with a body, name, pronouns, and appearance that align with one's gender identity or sexual self-concept can be deeply affirming, particularly for transgender and gender diverse youth.

    “The ability to present oneself in a VR environment with a body, name, pronouns, and appearance that align with one's gender identity or sexual self-concept can be deeply affirming, particularly for transgender and gender diverse youth for whom everyday offline embodiment may be a source of significant distress (Meade et al., 2025;Hasei et al., 2025).”
  • Participants described their avatar selection as an act of self-expression and identity exploration that enhanced their sense of psychological safety within the group.

    “participants described their avatar selection as an act of self-expression and identity exploration that enhanced their sense of psychological safety within the group.”
  • Hasei et al. (2025) found that over 1 year of regular 90 min sessions via the 'cluster' metaverse platform, LGBTQ+ youth aged 14-23 who were unable to access conventional in-person services showed improvements in perceived safety, self-confidence, and avatar-based self-expression.

    “Over 1 year of regular 90 min sessions conducted via the "cluster" metaverse platform, LGBTQ+ youth aged 14-23 who were unable to access conventional in-person services showed improvements in perceived safety, self-confidence, and avatar-based self-expression.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Garcia, J., Vargas, N., Clark, J. L., Magaña Álvarez, M., Nelons, D. A., & Parker, R. G. (2020). Social isolation and connectedness as determinants of well-being: Global evidence mapping focused on LGBTQ youth. Global Public Health, 15(4), 497–519. · DOI
  2. Escobar-Viera, C. G., Choukas-Bradley, S., Sidani, J., Maheux, A. J., Roberts, S. R., & Rollman, B. L. (2022). Examining social media experiences and attitudes toward technology-based interventions for reducing social isolation among LGBTQ youth living in rural United States: An online qualitative study. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 900695. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Allred, A., & Allred, K. (2024). Saving lives: Suicide prevention in LGBTQ youth. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 62(4), 6–8. · DOI
  4. Duncan, D. T., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender hate crimes and suicidality among a population-based sample of sexual-minority adolescents in Boston. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), 272–278. · DOI
  5. Liu, R. T., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Suicidal ideation and self-harm in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(3), 221–228. · DOI
  6. DelFerro, J., Whelihan, J., Min, J., Powell, M., DiFiore, G., Gzesh, A., Jelinek, S., Schwartz, K. T. G., Davis, M., Jones, J. D., Fiks, A. G., Jenssen, B. P., & Wood, S. (2024). The role of family support in moderating mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ youth in primary care. JAMA Pediatrics, 178(9), 914–922. · DOI
  7. Hatchel, T., Ingram, K. M., Mintz, S., Hartley, C., Valido, A., Espelage, D. L., & Wyman, P. (2019). Predictors of suicidal ideation and attempts among LGBTQ adolescents: The roles of help-seeking beliefs, peer victimization, depressive symptoms, and drug use. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2443–2455. · DOI
  8. Green, A. E., Price-Feeney, M., & Dorison, S. H. (2021). Association of sexual orientation acceptance with reduced suicide attempts among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning youth. LGBT Health, 8(1), 26–31. · DOI
  9. Gorse, M. (2022). Risk and protective factors to LGBTQ+ youth suicide: A review of the literature. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal: C & A, 39(1), 17–28. · DOI
  10. Eisenberg, M. E., Wood, B. A., Erickson, D. J., Gower, A. L., Kessel Schneider, S., & Corliss, H. L. (2021). Associations between LGBTQ+-supportive school and community resources and suicide attempts among adolescents in Massachusetts. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(6), 800–811. · DOI
  11. Fantus, S., & Newman, P. A. (2021). Promoting a positive school climate for sexual and gender minority youth through a systems approach: A theory-informed qualitative study. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(1), 9–19. · DOI
  12. Harris, R., Wilson-Daily, A. E., & Fuller, G. (2021). Exploring the secondary school experience of LGBT+ youth: an examination of school culture and school climate as understood by teachers and experienced by LGBT+ students. Intercultural Education, 32(4), 368–385. · DOI
  13. Morgan, A., Cunningham, E., Dyrud, J., Elliott, L., Ige, L., Knowles, G., Konieczka, L., Mascolo, A., Sabra, I., Sabra, S., Singh, E., Rimes, K. A., & Woodhead, C. (2024). Intersectionality informed and narrative-shifting whole school approaches for LGBTQ+ secondary school student mental health: A UK qualitative study. PloS One, 19(7), e0306864. · DOI
  14. Reczek, R., & Smith, E. B. (2021). How LGBTQ adults maintain ties with rejecting parents: Theorizing “conflict work” as family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 83(4), 1134–1153. · DOI
  15. van Bergen, D. D., Wilson, B. D. M., Russell, S. T., Gordon, A. G., & Rothblum, E. D. (2021). Parental responses to coming out by lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, pansexual, or two-spirited people across three age cohorts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 83(4), 1116–1133. · DOI
  16. Ojeda, M., Elipe, P., & Del Rey, R. (2024). LGBTQ+ bullying and cyberbullying: Beyond sexual orientation and gender identity. Victims & Offenders, 19(3), 491–512. · DOI
  17. Bower-Brown, S., Zadeh, S., & Jadva, V. (2023). Binary-trans, non-binary and gender-questioning adolescents’ experiences in UK schools. Journal of LGBT Youth, 20(1), 74–92. · DOI
  18. Cronin, T. J., Pepping, C. A., Halford, W. K., & Lyons, A. (2021). Mental health help-seeking and barriers to service access among lesbian, gay, and bisexual Australians. Australian Psychologist, 56(1), 46–60. · DOI
  19. Wike, T. L., Bouchard, L. M., Kemmerer, A., & Yabar, M. P. (2022). Victimization and resilience: Experiences of rural LGBTQ+ youth across multiple contexts. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), NP18988–NP19015. · DOI
  20. Kiaer, J. (2024). Conversing in the metaverse. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. · DOI
  21. Ghazinoory, S., Parvin, F., Saghafi, F., Afshari-Mofrad, M., Ghazavi, N., & Fatemi, M. (2025). Metaverse technology tree: a holistic view. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1545144. · DOI
  22. Li, L., Freeman, G., Schulenberg, K., & Acena, D. (2023). “we cried on each other’s shoulders”: How LGBTQ+ individuals experience social support in social virtual reality. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. · DOI
  23. Kundu, A., Barbareschi, G., Kawaguchi, M., Yano, Y., Ohashi, M., Kitaoka, K., Seike, A., & Minamizawa, K. (2024). “I wanted to create my ideal self”: Exploring avatar perception of LGBTQ+ users for therapy in Virtual Reality. In arXiv [cs.HC]. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00383. · DOI
  24. Povinelli, K., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Springboard, roadblock or “crutch”?: How transgender users leverage voice changers for gender presentation in social virtual reality. ArXiv [Cs.HC]. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2402.08217. · DOI
  25. Hailey, J., Burton, W., & Arscott, J. (2020). We are family: Chosen and created families as a protective factor against racialized trauma and anti-LGBTQ oppression among African American sexual and gender minority youth. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 16(2), 176–191. · DOI
  26. Wilson, C., & Cariola, L. A. (2020). LGBTQI+ youth and mental health: A systematic review of qualitative research. Adolescent Research Review, 5(2), 187–211. · DOI
  27. Morgan, H., O’Donovan, A., Almeida, R., Lin, A., & Perry, Y. (2020). The role of the avatar in gaming for trans and gender diverse young people. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8617. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Taylor, K., Coulombe, S., Coleman, T. A., Cameron, R., Davis, C., Wilson, C. L., Woodford, M. R., & Travers, R. (2022). Social support, discrimination, and Self-Esteem in LGBTQ + high school and Post-Secondary students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 19(3), 350–374. · DOI
  29. Russell, S. T., Bishop, M. D., Saba, V. C., James, I., & Ioverno, S. (2021). Promoting school safety for LGBTQ and all students. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(2), 160–166. · DOI
  30. Weinhardt, L. S., Wesp, L. M., Xie, H., Murray, J. J., Martín, J., DeGeorge, S., Weinhardt, C. B., Hawkins, M., & Stevens, P. (2021). Pride Camp: Pilot study of an intervention to develop resilience and self-esteem among LGBTQ youth. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 150. · DOI
  31. Bojarski, E., & Qayyum, Z. (2018). Psychodynamics of suicide in lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender youth. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy: JICAP, 1–9. · DOI
  32. Chang, C. J., Kellerman, J., Feinstein, B. A., Selby, E. A., & Goldbach, J. T. (2022). Greater minority stress is associated with lower intentions to disclose suicidal thoughts among LGBTQ + youth. Archives of Suicide Research: Official Journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research, 26(2), 626–640. · DOI
  33. Sahoo, S., Venkatesan, V., & Chakravarty, R. (2023). ’Coming out’/self-disclosure in LGBTQ+ adolescents and youth: International and Indian scenario - A narrative review of published studies in the last decade (2012-2022). Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 65(10), 1012–1024. · DOI
  34. Weinhardt, L. S., Wesp, L. M., Xie, H., Murray, J. J., Martín, J., DeGeorge, S., Weinhardt, C. B., Hawkins, M., & Stevens, P. (2021). Pride Camp: Pilot study of an intervention to develop resilience and self-esteem among LGBTQ youth. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 150. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hasei, J., Matsumoto, Y., Kawai, H., Okahisa, Y., Takaki, M., & Ozaki, T.
Affiliations
  • Okayama University
  • Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Science of Functional Recovery and Reconstruction, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceu-tical Sciences, Okayama University
Venue
Journal of Metaverse
Published
2025-12-31
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
156-167
ISSN
2792-0232
Cited by
7
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review