Cited by 810Science Education and PedagogySTEM EducationMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education

Open access
Stohlmann, Micah, Moore, Tamara, Roehrig, Gillian·2012·Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research

Abstract

Quality Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education is vital for the future success of students. Integrated STEM education is one way to make learning more connected and relevant for students. There is a need for further research and discussion on the knowledge, experiences, and background that teachers need to effectively teach integrated STEM education. A support, teaching, efficacy, and materials (s.t.e.m.) model of considerations for teaching integrated STEM education was developed through a year-long partnership with a middle school. The middle school was implementing Project Lead the Way’s Gateway to Technology curriculum. The s.t.e.m. model is a good starting point for teachers as they implement and improve integrated STEM education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5703/1288284314653

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Berlin, D., & White, A. (1995). Connecting school science and mathematics in House, P. & Coxford, A. (Eds.), Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum: 1995 Yearbook. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  2. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (Eds). (2009). National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council Engineering in K-12 education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  3. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America's school (3 rd Edition). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research
Published
2012-04-12
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
28-34
ISSN
2157-9288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167170231
Cited by
810
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
27.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
STEM integration, teacher knowledge, teacher support, teacher self-efficacy, teaching materials, Project Lead the Way, STEM teacher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review