The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utilization of Rice Straw and Different Treatments to Improve Its Feed Value for Ruminants: A Review
Open accessAbstract
This paper gives an overview of the availability, nutritive quality, and possible strategies to improve the utilization of rice straw as a feed ingredient for ruminants. Approximately 80% of the rice in the world is grown by small-scale farmers in developing countries, including South East Asia. The large amount of rice straw as a by-product of the rice production is mainly used as a source of feed for ruminant livestock. Rice straw is rich in polysaccharides and has a high lignin and silica content, limiting voluntary intake and reducing degradability by ruminal microorganisms. Several methods to improve the utilization of rice straw by ruminants have been investigated in the past. However, some physical treatments are not practical because of the requirement for machinery or treatments are not economical feasible for the farmers. Chemical treatments, such as NaOH, NH3 or urea, currently seem to be more practical for on-farm use. Alternative treatments to improve the nutritive value of rice straw are the use of ligninolytic fungi (white-rot fungi), with their extracellular ligninolytic enzymes, or specific enzymes degrading cellulose and/or hemicellulose. The use of fungi or enzyme treatments is expected to be a more practical and environmental-friendly approach for enhancing the nutritive value of rice straw and can be cost-effective in the future. Using fungi and enzymes might be combined with the more classical chemical or physical treatments. However, available data on using fungi and enzymes for improving the quality of rice straw are relatively scarce.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enzymatic "Combustion": The Microbial Degradation of Lignin
Kirk, T. K., & Farrell, R. L. (1987) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002341 · Cited by 2,589
Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Wood and Wood Components
Eriksson, K.-E. L., Blanchette, R. A., & Ander, P. (1990) · Springer Series in Wood Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46687-8 · Cited by 1,400
Lignocellulose biotechnology: issues of bioconversion and enzyme production
Howard, R. L., Abotsi, E., Jansen, V. R. E. L., & Howard, S. (2003) · African Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.5897/ajb2003.000-1115 · Cited by 849
Chemical Factors Involved in Ruminal Fiber Digestion
Hoover, W. H. (1986) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(86)80724-x · Cited by 795
Review article: The alkali treatment of straws
Jackson, M. G. (1977) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(77)90013-x · Cited by 506
Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality
Van Soest, P. J. (2006) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.023 · Cited by 478
Control of feed intake and regulation of energy balance in ruminants.
Baile, C. A., & Forbes, J. M. (1974) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1974.54.1.160 · Cited by 390
Phenolic acid bridges between polysaccharides and lignin in wheat internodes
Iiyama, K., Lam, T. B. T., & Stone, B. A. (1990) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/0031-9422(90)80009-6 · Cited by 380
Ligninolytic fungi in bioremediation: extracellular enzyme production and degradation rate
Novotný, Č., Svobodová, K., Erbanová, P., Cajthaml, T., Kasinath, A., Lang, E., & Šašek, V. (2004) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.019 · Cited by 303
Pretreatment by microwave/alkali of rice straw and its enzymic hydrolysis
Zhu, S., Wu, Y., Yu, Z., Liao, J., & Zhang, Y. (2005) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.016 · Cited by 290
Cited by
Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system
Alexander, P., Brown, C., Arneth, A., Finnigan, J., Moran, D., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.014 · Cited by 524
Gao, Z., Wang, W., Lu, X., Zhu, F., Liu, W., Wang, X., & Lei, C. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.074 · Cited by 206
Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage
Oladosu, Y., Rafii, M. Y., Abdullah, N., Magaji, U., Hussin, G., Ramli, A., & Miah, G. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/7985167 · Cited by 167
Effect of lignocellulose related compounds on microalgae growth and product biosynthesis: a review
Miazek, K., Remacle, C., Richel, A., & Goffin, D. (2014) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en7074446 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarnklong, C., Cone, J. W., Pellikaan, W., & Hendriks, W. H.
- Venue
- Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
- Published
- 2010-04-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 680-692
- ISSN
- 1011-2367 (ISSN-L)
- 1976-5517
- OpenAlex
- W2102092261
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utilization of Rice Straw and Different Treatments to Improve Its Feed Value for Ruminants: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5713/ajas.2010.80619
- The paper
- Sarnklong, C., Cone, J. W., Pellikaan, W., & Hendriks, W. H. (2010). Utilization of Rice Straw and Different Treatments to Improve Its Feed Value for Ruminants: A Review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.80619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.