Cited by 7Analytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsHealthcare RegulationBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

A rapid sterility method using solid phase cytometry for cell-based preparations and culture media and buffers

Mohammadi, Mahsa, Bauer, Aline, Roesti, David, Anders, Hans-Joachim·2023·PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Abstract

In this article, we demonstrate a rapid sterility testing method for non-filterable cell-based preparations and its in-process control media/buffers. The selected rapid sterility test (RST) in this work is based on the ScanRDI ® system, which detects fluorescently labeled microorganisms with solid-phase cytometry. ScanRDI ® has been chosen due to its sensitivity for detecting viable microorganisms down to one microbial cell with a shorter time to detection compared with the compendial sterility test (CST) method. The RST was validated for a CAR-T cell-therapy product with 4 days of time to detection (TTD) and evaluated for in-process control of media/buffers with real-time detection method success according to USP , Ph. Eur. 5.1.6, and PDA Technical Report No. 33. The validation parameters included limit of detection and equivalence in routine operations, specificity, robustness, ruggedness, and repeatability. For the validation, a combination of pharmacopoeial ATCC strains as well as in-house isolates were used. In addition, the evaluation study of this RST for in-process control of media/buffers was assessed by performing the limit of detection and equivalence with four representative microorganisms. Where applicable, results were statistically evaluated to demonstrate equivalence and no significant difference of the rapid method as compared with the CST method have been detected. All acceptance criteria have been met, and the solid-phase cytometry technology was successful…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012775

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct fluorescent staining and membrane filtration approaches, as in ScanRDI, enable near real-time detection by capturing microorganisms on a membrane, staining with nucleic acid-binding fluorophores, and enumerating via laser scanning cytometry, reducing detection time to less than 3 h depending on bioburden levels.

    “Alternatively, direct fluorescent staining and membrane filtration approaches, as employed in systems like ScanRDI, enable near real-time detection by capturing microorganisms on a membrane, staining with nucleic acid-binding fluorophores, and enumerating them via laser scanning cytometry, reducing detection time to less than 3 h depending on bioburden levels (Smith et al., 2010; Mohammadi et al.,”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohammadi, M., Bauer, A., Roesti, D., & Anders, H.-J.
Affiliations
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Published
2023
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
498-513
ISSN
  • 1079-7440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-2124
OpenAlex
W4385801888
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Novartis Repository (Novartis) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
culture media, buffers, in-process control, CAR T-cell therapy, detection limit, method validation
MeSH terms
Culture Media, Humans, Infertility, Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review