Marking Ethnicity Through Premortem Cranial Modification Among the Pre-Inca Chiribaya, Peru
Abstract
This chapter reconstructs identity and assesses group differentiation among the pre-Inca Chiribaya of southern Peru (ad 700–1359) based on an analysis of cranial modification complemented by other forms of research. The Chiribaya culture was made up of distinct communities of specialists such as fishermen (pescadores) and agriculturalists (labradores). Differences between these two economic groups cut across nearly every category of production, from ceramic and spoon styles to mortuary patterning, and suggest a fundamental cultural divide within Chiribaya society. As such, this chapter focuses on the use of head form as a visual cue to ethnicity, differentiating one group of “insiders” from another, as well as differentiating “insiders” collectively from “outsiders.” It also explores the sociopolitical environment that may have promoted the use of symbols of group membership such as cranial modification. This chapter concludes that cranial modification was used to reflect ethnic differences that were defined primarily by economic activity, and that selection of a specific head shape may have been inspired by the surrounding mountains, or divine apus, from whom they believed they descended.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lozada (2011) focuses on the social import of head shaping as a sign of ethnicity reflected in economic activity for Chiribaya groups.
“Lozada's (2011) work involving Chiribaya skeletal samples where she focuses on the social import of head shaping as a sign of ethnicity, as reflected in economic activity for these groups.”
From Cranial modification and the shapes of heads across the Andes (2020) · cites this paper as Lozada (2011)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 3 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Lozada, M. C.
- Corresponding author
- Lozada, María Cecilia
- Venue
- The Bioarchaeology of the Human HeadDecapitation, Decoration, and Deformation
- Publisher
- University Press of Florida
- Published
- 2011-05-08
- Pages
- 228-240
- OpenAlex
- W2485591555
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University Press of Florida eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Latin American history and culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
- Keywords
- cranial modification, ethnicity, group differentiation, head shape, economic specialization, fishermen, farmers, funerary practices, Apus, divine descent, sociopolitical organization, southern Peru
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review