Cited by 23Afro-Latin American StudiesConflict, Peace, and Violence in ColombiaHistory and Politics in Latin America

Afro-Colombian Social Movements

Dixon, Kwame, Burdick, John·2012·Comparative Perspectives on Afro-Latin America

Abstract

This chapter explores the struggle for land rights in Colombia as well as the ways grassroots activists are using new laws to challenge social discrimination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5744/florida/9780813037561.003.0007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Dixon, K., & Burdick, J.
Venue
Comparative Perspectives on Afro-Latin America
Published
2012-03-11
Pages
135-155
OpenAlex
W2490794378
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University Press of Florida eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
  • Social Sciences › Demography › History and Politics in Latin America
Keywords
land rights, grassroots activism, social discrimination, anti-discrimination law, Afro-Colombian communities, Colombia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review