Cited by 1,137Cultural Identity and RepresentationArt, Politics, and ModernismCultural Studies and Colonialism

Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing Violence in the New Racial Capitalism

Melamed, Jodi·2010·University of Minnesota Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5749/9780816678624

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Workers were acutely aware of wage disparities and sought to demonstrate their capability in the face of structural devaluation, even as they navigated feelings of deep injustice.

    “Workers were acutely aware of wage disparities and sought to demonstrate their capability in the face of structural devaluation (even as they navigated feelings of deep injustice), resonating with Melamed’s framing of neoliberalism as yet “another form of racial capitalism” [88].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melamed, J.
Corresponding author
Melamed, Jodi
Venue
University of Minnesota Press eBooks
Published
2010-01-25
OpenAlex
W2252149024
Cited by
1,137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.54
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Minnesota Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Cultural Studies and Colonialism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review