The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodology of the Oppressed
Abstract
In a work with far-reaching implications, Chela Sandoval does no less than revise the genealogy of theory over the past thirty years, inserting what she terms Third World feminism into the narrative in a way that thoroughly alters our perspective on contemporary culture and subjectivity.What Sandoval has identified is a language, a rhetoric of resistance to postmodern cultural conditions. U.S liberation movements of the post-World War II era generated specific modes of oppositional consciousness. Out of these emerged a new activity of consciousness and language Sandoval calls the of the oppressed. This methodology -- born of the strains of the cultural and identity struggles that currently mark global exchange -- holds out the possibility of a new historical moment, a new citizen-subject, and a new form of alliance consciousness and politics. Utilizing semiotics and U.S. Third World feminist criticism, Sandoval demonstrates how this methodology mobilizes love as a category of critical analysis. Rendering this approach in all its specifics, Methodology of the Oppressed gives rise to an alternative mode of criticism opening new perspectives on a theoretical, literary, aesthetic, social movement, or psychic expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Borderlands/La frontera: the new mestiza
Anzaldúa, G. (2017) · Censored · doi:10.1515/9780773551886-027 · Cited by 10,736
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
Foucault, M., & Miskowiec, J. (1986) · Diacritics · doi:10.2307/464648 · Cited by 5,636
The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art
Clifford, J. (1988) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9x0h · Cited by 5,528
Césaire, A. (2022) · Postcolonlsm · doi:10.4324/9781003101406-19 · Cited by 3,705
Lakoff, R. (1973) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500000051 · Cited by 3,138
Anderson, K., & Davis, A. Y. (1982) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1903191 · Cited by 1,087
Gilman, S. L. (1985) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/448327 · Cited by 953
Cited by
Intersectionality's Definitional Dilemmas
Collins, P. H. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142 · Cited by 2,419
Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory
Collins, P. H. (2019) · doi:10.1215/9781478007098 · Cited by 1,639
“Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles
Mohanty, C. T. (2003) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/342914 · Cited by 1,413
Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018) · doi:10.4324/9780429492204 · Cited by 1,010
Pedagogy of fear: toward a Fanonian theory of ‘safety’ in race dialogue
Leonardo, Z., & Porter, R. K. (2010) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2010.482898 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandoval, C.
- Venue
- University of Minnesota Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Minnesota Press
- Published
- 2010-01-25
- OpenAlex
- W609726200
- Cited by
- 2,407
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 757.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodology of the Oppressed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5749/9780816687107
- The paper
- Sandoval, C. (2010). Methodology of the Oppressed. University of Minnesota Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5749/9780816687107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.