The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; its reference list is not available.
Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability
Abstract
Building Access investigates twentieth-century strategies for designing the world with disability in mind. Illustrated with a wealth of rare archival materials, this book brings together scientific, social, and political histories in what is not only the pioneering critical account of Universal Design but also a deep engagement with the politics of knowing, making, and belonging in twentieth-century United States.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“-Fluctuations in energy levels related to fatigue and physical symptoms -and oen compounded by external stressors, is another area in which the needs of neurodivergent individuals differ significantly, as they might experience periods (hours, days, or weeks) in which they grapple with physical, emotional, or mental fatigue [16], [36], [66].”
From Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for Change (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Students with disabilities have long had an active role reshaping their educational environments -Berkeley's based Cowell students famously subverted hierarchies of professional expertise creating the Center for Independent Living in 1972, puing disabled people in the role of service providers [35].”
From Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for Change (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“We see these microinterventions as foundational in processes of access knowing-making [35], as they activate new ways of experimenting with technology, countering stigma and facilitating mutual support.”
From Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for Change (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“But despite the historically prominent role of students with disabilities in shaping collective access in universities [35], Danish CS students are still largely framed as the passive recipients of parallel systems of bureaucratic support, rendering both their access needs and their micro-interventions invisible in their departments.”
From Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for Change (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“The notion of access labor (or access work) is prominent in accessibility and critical access studies [35], [70], [88] and it conceptually extends core CSCW understandings of articulation work.”
From Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for Change (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“use of UD often decenters disability in favor of 'disability-neutral' approaches to access for all [21]”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Access frictions [20] emerge at points of tension between institutions and agents of resistance.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, institutional processes of disability classification are built upon a legacy of paternalism [11, 20], which casts disabled individuals as helpless and in need of “fixing” [11].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, collective practices of access are resistant and done in solidarity [20].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“In alignment with recent HCI scholarship that draws on Critical Disability Studies [3, 23, 59, 60, 63, 64], we position disabled people not only as recipients of care but also as infrastructural experts whose knowing-making practices [20] demonstrate the political potential of friction [27, 51].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Rather than making infrastructures and the design of services “frictionless” or “adaptive” for disabled communities — which is not possible nor desirable because disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20] — student groups strategically leverage points of disruption to confront authority, compel negotiations, and demand systemic change.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Through these practices, we demonstrate the ingenuity of (in)formal care infrastructures to appropriate resources across formal and informal domains, reflecting the enduring maker culture central to disability resistance movements [20].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20]”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“In doing so, we extend HCI scholarship by reframing access labour as routine infrastructuring: sustained, collaborative, and resistant to the reactive, ad hoc model of accommodations offered by institutions [20, 42, 49, 61].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Individuals who directly encounter access frictions possess the situated knowledge [1, 21, 64] required to subvert and reactivate them as counteractive forces that confront university decision-makers [20].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamraie, A.
- Corresponding author
- Hamraie, Aimi
- ORCID
- Hamraie, Aimi
- Venue
- University of Minnesota Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Minnesota Press
- Published
- 2017-10-22
- OpenAlex
- W4247616855
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Minnesota Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture, Modernity, and Design
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- universal design, disability, accessibility, twentieth-century United States, sense of belonging, social history of disability, architectural design, disability history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5749/minnesota/9781517901639.001.0001
- The paper
- Hamraie, A. (2017). Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. University of Minnesota Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9781517901639.001.0001
