The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Black on Both Sides: A Racial History of Trans Identity
Abstract
In Black on Both Sides , C. Riley Snorton identifies multiple intersections between blackness and transness from the mid-nineteenth century to present-day anti-black and anti-trans legislation and violence. Drawing on a deep and varied archive of materials, Snorton attends to how slavery and the production of racialized gender provided the foundations for an understanding of gender as mutable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These documented experiences are racialized: 'trans' and 'women' in academic literature are nearly always white-coded.
“It is important to note, however, that these documented experiences are racialized: 'trans' and 'women' in academic literature are nearly always white-coded [99].”
From Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software (2024) · cites this paper as [99]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software
Frluckaj, H., Stevens, N., Howison, J., & Dabbish, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3687047 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Snorton, C. R.
- Corresponding author
- Snorton, C. Riley
- Venue
- University of Minnesota Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Minnesota Press
- Published
- 2017-10-25
- OpenAlex
- W4251490606
- Cited by
- 1,345
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 264 · 2023: 221 · 2022: 243 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 27
- FWCI
- 57.01
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Minnesota Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Theological Perspectives and Practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
