The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Economic Impacts of Pollinator Declines: An Approach to Assessing the Consequences
Open accessAbstract
Since agricultural activities were first recorded, there have been shortages of pollinators. Today it seems that pollination systems in many areas of agriculture are threatened by the inadequacy or lack of sustainable managed, indigenous, or imported pollinators. Pollinator shortages can adversely affect crop production and commodity markets. This paper presents an economic model than can be used to measure some of the economic impacts of pollinator deficits on traded commodities. This economic analysis indicates that consumers of a commodity affected by a pollinator deficit may suffer because the commodity costs more and becomes less available. At the same time, although the producers of the affected commodity may experience crop declines, they may also experience economic gains in the form of higher prices. The amount the producer gains or loses depends on the shape of the supply and demand functions, and the magnitude of these losses or gains is an empirical question. Although there are few data available to evaluate this model, those we do have indicate that serious problems for world food supply, security, and trade could be in the offing if current declines in pollinator abundance, diversity, and availability are not reversed. Various crops and cropping systems are suggested as practical starting places for economic studies of the effects of pollinator declines, with emphasis on the type of data required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Cited by
The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects
LOSEY, J. E., & VAUGHAN, M. (2006) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[311:tevoes]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,942
Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees
Klein, A., Steffan–Dewenter, I., & Tscharntke, T. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2306 · Cited by 854
Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., & Ferguson, E. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.013 · Cited by 567
Colla, S. R., & Packer, L. (2008) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9340-5 · Cited by 355
Economic Evaluation of Pollination Services Comparing Coffee Landscapes in Ecuador and Indonesia
Olschewski, R., Tscharntke, T., Benítez, P. C., Schwarze, S., & Klein, A.-M. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01629-110107 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Kevan, P. G., & Phillips, T. P.
- Venue
- Conservation Ecology
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1195-5449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W183432788
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Economic Impacts of Pollinator Declines: An Approach to Assessing the Consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-00272-050108
- The paper
- Kevan, P. G., & Phillips, T. P. (2001). The Economic Impacts of Pollinator Declines: An Approach to Assessing the Consequences. Conservation Ecology. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00272-050108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.