The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dubnick, M. J. (1998) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · Cited by 3,808
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,724
Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide
TREVES, A., & KARANTH, K. U. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x · Cited by 1,618
Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis
Lempert, R., Popper, S., & Bankes, S. (2003) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/mr1626 · Cited by 1,244
Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems
Walters, C. (1997) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00026-010201 · Cited by 710
Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R., Redford, K. H., & Robinson, J. G. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01232.x · Cited by 527
Ecological Optimization and Adaptive Management
Walters, C. J., & Hilborn, R. (1978) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001105 · Cited by 518
Resilience, Flexibility and Adaptive Management - - Antidotes for Spurious Certitude?
Gunderson, L. (1999) · Conservation Ecology · doi:10.5751/es-00089-030107 · Cited by 457
Are We Conserving What We Say We Are? Measuring Ecological Integrity within Protected Areas
PARRISH, J. D., BRAUN, D. P., & UNNASCH, R. S. (2003) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:awcwws]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 438
Store, R., & Kangas, J. (2001) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00120-7 · Cited by 432
Cited by
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
“On an overarching level, the basic process is straightforward: one chooses an action based on broad considerations of risk and other aspects, monitors the effect, and adjusts the action based on the monitored results ( Linkov et al., 2006 ).”
BackgroundPerspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system
Lyu, H.-M., Shen, S.-L., Zhou, A., & Yang, J. (2019) · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.019 · Cited by 312
Hazards and Risks of Engineered Nanoparticles for the Environment and Human Health
Hristozov, D., & Malsch, I. (2009) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su1041161 · Cited by 149
Incorporating the soil function concept into sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives
Volchko, Y., Norrman, J., Bergknut, M., Rosén, L., & Söderqvist, T. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.025 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., & Ferguson, E.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1072-1093
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127671703
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 23.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.013
- The paper
- Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., & Ferguson, E. (2006). From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
