The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human-caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk
Open accessAbstract
A growing number of studies quantify the impact of nonlethal human disturbance on the behavior and reproductive success of animals. Athough many are well designed and analytically sophisticated, most lack a theoretical framework for making predictions and for understanding why particular responses occur. Behavioral ecologists have recently begun to fill this theoretical vacuum by applying economic models of antipredator behavior to disturbance studies. In this emerging paradigm, predation and nonlethal disturbance stimuli create similar trade-offs between avoiding perceived risk and other fitness-enhancing activities, such as feeding, parental care, or mating. A vast literature supports the hypothesis that antipredator behavior has a cost to other activities, and that this trade-off is optimized when investment in antipredator behavior tracks short-term changes in predation risk. Prey have evolved antipredator responses to generalized threatening stimuli, such as loud noises and rapidly approaching objects. Thus, when encountering disturbance stimuli ranging from the dramatic, low-flying helicopter to the quiet wildlife photographer, animal responses are likely to follow the same economic principles used by prey encountering predators. Some authors have argued that, similar to predation risk, disturbance stimuli can indirectly affect fitness and population dynamics via the energetic and lost opportunity costs of risk avoidance. We elaborate on this argument by discussing why, from an evolutionary perspective, disturbance stimuli should be analogous to predation risk. We then consider disturbance effects on the behavior of individuals - vigilance, fleeing, habitat selection, mating displays, and parental investment - as well as indirect effects on populations and communities. A wider application of predation risk theory to disturbance studies should increase the generality of predictions and make mitigation more effective without over-regulating human activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions
Brown, J. S., Laundre, J. W., & Gurung, M. (1999) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1383287 · Cited by 1,347
PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
ELGAR, M. A. (1989) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1989.tb00636.x · Cited by 1,119
Population Consequences of Predation‐Sensitive Foraging: The Serengeti Wildebeest
Sinclair, A. R. E., & Arcese, P. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939353 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Lewin, W.-C., Arlinghaus, R., & Mehner, T. (2006) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/10641260600886455 · Cited by 668
Human disturbance: people as predation‐free predators?
Beale, C. M., & Monaghan, P. (2004) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00900.x · Cited by 449
Habituation and sensitization: new thoughts about old ideas
Blumstein, D. T. (2016) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.05.012 · Cited by 426
Human Activity Helps Prey Win the Predator-Prey Space Race
Muhly, T. B., Semeniuk, C., Massolo, A., Hickman, L., & Musiani, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017050 · Cited by 337
How Nature-Based Tourism Might Increase Prey Vulnerability to Predators
Geffroy, B., Samia, D. S. M., Bessa, E., & Blumstein, D. T. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.010 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Frid, A., & Dill, L. M.
- Venue
- Conservation Ecology
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1195-5449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2547623031
- Cited by
- 1,915
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human-caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-00404-060111
- The paper
- Frid, A., & Dill, L. M. (2002). Human-caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk. Conservation Ecology. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00404-060111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.