The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Myths of Restoration Ecology
Open accessAbstract
Pollinator conservation is of increasing interest in the light of managed honeybee (Apis mellifera) declines, and declines in some species of wild bees.Much work has gone into understanding the effects of habitat enhancements in agricultural systems on wild bee abundance, richness and pollination services.However, the effects of ecological restoration targeting "natural" ecological endpoints (e.g.restoring former agricultural fields to historic vegetation types or improving degraded natural lands) on wild bees have received relatively little attention, despite their potential importance for countering habitat loss.2. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of ecological restoration on wild bee abundance and richness, focusing on unmanaged bee communities in lands restored and managed to increase habitat availability and quality.Specifically, we assessed bee abundance and/or richness across studies comparing restored vs.unrestored treatments and studies investigating effects of specific habitat restoration techniques, such as burning, grazing, invasive plant removal and seeding.3. We analysed 28 studies that met our selection criteria: these represented 11 habitat types and 7 restoration techniques.Nearly all restorations associated with these studies were performed without explicit consideration of habitat needs for bees or other pollinators.The majority of restorations targeted plant community goals, which could potentially have ancillary benefits for bees.4. Restoration had overall positive effects on wild bee abundance and richness across multiple habitat types.Specific restoration actions, tested independently, also tended to have positive effects on wild bee richness and abundance. Synthesis and applications.We found strong evidence that ecological restoration advances wild bee conservation.This is important given that habitat loss is recognized as a leading factor in pollinator decline.Pollinator responses to land management are rarely evaluated in non-agricultural settings and so support for wild bees may be an underappreciated benefit of botanically focused management.Future restoration projects that explicitly consider the needs of wild bees could be more effective at providing nesting, foraging and other habitat resources.We encourage land managers to design and evaluate restoration projects with the habitat needs of wild bee species in mind.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management
Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x · Cited by 2,049
Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth’s Ecosystems in the New Millennium
Hobbs, R. J., & Harris, J. A. (2001) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002239.x · Cited by 905
Seabloom, E. W., & Valk, A. G. (2003) · Wetlands · doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0001:pdcaio]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 135
Cited by
The EU Water Framework Directive: from great expectations to problems with implementation
Voulvoulis, N., Arpon, K. D., & Giakoumis, T. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.228 · Cited by 555
Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice
Bull, J. W., Suttle, K. B., Gordon, A., Singh, N. J., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2013) · Oryx · doi:10.1017/s003060531200172x · Cited by 482
Satisfying future water demands for agriculture
de Fraiture, C., & Wichelns, D. (2010) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.008 · Cited by 441
Intervention Ecology: Applying Ecological Science in the Twenty-first Century
Hobbs, R. J., Hallett, L. M., Ehrlich, P. R., & Mooney, H. A. (2011) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.6.6 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Hilderbrand, R. H., Watts, A. C., & Randle, A. M.
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134289046
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Myths of Restoration Ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-01277-100119
- The paper
- Hilderbrand, R. H., Watts, A. C., & Randle, A. M. (2005). The Myths of Restoration Ecology. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01277-100119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.