Cited by 306Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementUrban Arborization and Environmental StudiesForest Ecology and Conservation

Urban Forest and Rural Cities: Multi-sited Households, Consumption Patterns, and Forest Resources in Amazonia

Open access
Padoch, Christine, Brondizio, Eduardo, Costa, Sandra, Pinedo-Vasquez, Miguel, Sears, Robin R., Siqueira, Andrea·2008·Ecology and Society

Abstract

Padoch, C., E. Brondizio, S. Costa, M. Pinedo-Vasquez, R. R. Sears, and A. Siqueira. 2008. Urban forest and rural cities: multi-sited households, consumption patterns, and forest resources in Amazonia. Ecology and Society 13(2): 2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02526-130202

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-02526-130202

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Background processes of globalization, urbanization, migration, and infrastructure development are enhancing flows of ideas, money, and goods within and between rural and urban areas, leading to livelihoods that are increasingly pluralistic and multilocal.

    “background processes of globalization, urbanization, migration, and infrastructure development are enhancing flows of ideas, money, and goods within and between rural and urban areas, leading to livelihoods that are increasingly pluralistic, engaging in both on and off-farm employment, and multilocal, occupying both urban and rural spaces simultaneously”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Grau, H. R., T. M. Aide, J. Zimmerman, J. R. Thomlinson, E. Helmer, and X. Zou. 2003. The ecological consequences of socioeconomic and land-use changes in post-agriculture Puerto Rico. Bioscience 53(12):1159-1168.
  2. Hecht, S. B., and S. S. Saatchi. 2007. Globalization and forest resurgence: changes in forest cover in El Salvador. Bioscience 57(8):663-672.
  3. Hiraoka, M. 1994. Mudanças nos padrões econômicos de uma população ribeirinha do estuário do Amazonas. Pages 133-157 in L.
  4. Kruger, F.1998. Taking advantage of rural assets as a coping strategy for the urban poor: the case of rural-urban interrelationships in Botswana. Environment and Urbanization 10(1):199-134.
  5. Lambin, E. F., B. L. Turner, H. J. Geist, S. B. Agbola, A. Angelsen, J. W. Bruce, O. T. Coomes, R. Dirzo, G. Fischer, C. Folke, P. S. George, K. Homewood, J. Imbernon, R. Leemans, X. Li, E. F. Moran, M. Mortimore, P. S. Ramakrishnan, Ecology and Society 13(2): 2 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art2/
  6. McDowell, C., and A. de Haan. 1997. Migration and sustainable livelihoods: a critical review of the literature. IDS Working Paper 65, Institute of Development Studies Brighton, UK.
  7. Mourão, L. 1999. Do açaí ao palmito: uma história ecológica das permanencias, tensões e rupturas no estuário Amazônico. Dissertation, Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos, Universidade Federal do Para, Belém, Brazil.
  8. Nugent, S. 1993. Amazonian Caboclo society: an essay on invisibility and peasant economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  9. Padoch C., and M. Pinedo-Vasquez. 2006. Concurrent activities and invisible technologies: an example of timber management in Amazonia. Pages 172-180 in D. A. Posey, editor. Human Impacts on the Amazon: the role of traditional ecological knowledge in conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
  10. Paganoto, F. 2007. Reflexões sobre novas tendêncas migratórias no Brasil contemporâneo: a ascensão do fluxo urbano-rural. Pages 1-16 in Proceedings of the 12th Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional (ANPUR), 21- 25 May 2007, Belém, Brazil.
  11. Perz, S. G. 2000. The quality of urban environments in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Indicators Research 49(2):181-212.
  12. Pinedo-Vasquez, M., and C. Padoch. 2008. Urban, rural and in-between: multi-sited households, mobility and resource management in the Amazon floodplain. In M. N. Alexiades, editor. Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: contemporary ethnoecological perspectives. Berghahn, Oxford, UK. (In press.)
  13. Pinedo-Vasquez, M., C. Padoch, D. McGrath, and T. Ximenes-Ponte. 2002b. Biodiversity as a product of smallholder response to change in Amazonia. Pages 167-178 in H. Brookfield, C. Padoch, H. Parsons, and M. Stocking, editors. Cultivating biodiversity: understanding, analysing and using agricultural diversity. ITDG Publishing, London, UK.
  14. Preston, D. A. 1989. Too busy to farm: under- utilisation of farm land in Central Java. Journal of Development Studies 26(1):43-57.
  15. Rigg, J. 2002. Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: rethinking the links in the rural South. World Development 34(1):180-202.
  16. Rigg, J. 2003. Evolving rural-urban relations and livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Pages 231-256 in
  17. Rudel, T. K. 2003. Tropical deforestation. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
  18. Rudel, T. K., D. Bates, and R. Machinguiashi. 2002. A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(1):87-102.
  19. Santos-Granero, F., and F. Barclay. 2000. Tamed frontiers: society, and civil rights in upper Amazonia. Westview Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  20. Sathler, D., M. Felippe, and E. Ribeiro. 2007. As cidades médias da Amazônia Legal: uma análise comparativa dos aspectos demográficos e socioeconômicos. Pages 1-23 in Proceedings of the 12th Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional (ANPUR), 21-25 May 2007, Belém, Brazil.
  21. Sears, R. R., and M. Pinedo-Vasquez. 2004. Axing the trees, growing the forest: smallholder timber production on the Amazon varzea. Pages 258-275 in D. J. Zarin, J. R. R. Alavalapatti, F. E. Putz, and M. Schmink, editors. Working forests in the Neotropics: conservation through sustainable management? Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
  22. Siqueira, A. D. 2006. Mulheres, relações de gênero e tomadas de decisão em unidades caboclas do estuário amazônico. Pages 135-236 in C. Adams, R. S. S. Murrieta, and W. A. Neves, editors. Sociedades Caboclas Amazônicas. AnaBlume/ FAPESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
  23. Smit, W. 1998. The rural linkages of urban households in Durban, South Africa. Environment and Urbanization 10(1):77-87.
  24. Stearman, A. M. 1985. Camba and kolla: migration and development in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. University of Florida Press, Gainsville, Florida, USA.
  25. Strudwick, J., and G. L. Sobel. 1988. Uses of Euterpe oleracea Mart. in the Amazon estuary, Brazil. Pages 225-253 in M. Balick, editor. The palm-tree of life: biology, utilization and conservation. Advances in Economic Botany 6, New York Botanical Garden Press, New York, New York, USA.
  26. Tiffen, M., M. Mortimore, and F. Gichuki. 1994. More people less erosion: environmental recovery in Kenya. John Wiley, London, UK.
  27. Weinstein, B. 1983. The Amazon rubber boom, 1850-1920. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  28. WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. 2002. House-lot gardens in Santarém, Para, Brazil: linking rural with urban. Urban Ecosystems 6(1-2):43-65.
  29. WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. 2006. Urban house-lot gardens and agrodiversity in Santarém, Pará, Brazil: spaces of conservation that link urban with rural. Pages 121-140 in K. S. Zimmer, editor. Globalization and new geographies of conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Ecology and Society 13(2): 2 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art2/
  30. WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A., and P. S. de Souza. 2005. Surviving the city: urban home gardens and the economy of affection in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Latin American Geography 4(1):107- 126.
  31. Wright, S. J., and H. C. Muller-Landau. 2006. The future of tropical forest species.Biotropica 38 (3):287-301.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padoch, C., Brondizio, E., Costa, S., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Sears, R. R., & Siqueira, A.
Affiliations
  • New York Botanical Garden (US)
  • Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (BR)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Venue
Ecology and Society
Published
2008
Volume
13
Issue
2
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549830915
Cited by
306
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0731594, 0527578)
  • Tinker Foundation
  • Universidade Federal do Pará
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
urban forests, rural cities, consumption patterns, forest resources, Amazon basin, urban-rural relations, deforestation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review