Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,305

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Roads on Animal Abundance: an Empirical Review and Synthesis

Open access
Fahrig, Lenore, Rytwinski, Trina·2009·Ecology and Society

Abstract

We attempted a complete review of the empirical literature on effects of roads and traffic on animal abundance and distribution.We found 79 studies, with results for 131 species and 30 species groups.Overall, the number of documented negative effects of roads on animal abundance outnumbered the number of positive effects by a factor of 5; 114 responses were negative, 22 were positive, and 56 showed no effect.Amphibians and reptiles tended to show negative effects.Birds showed mainly negative or no effects, with a few positive effects for some small birds and for vultures.Small mammals generally showed either positive effects or no effect, mid-sized mammals showed either negative effects or no effect, and large mammals showed predominantly negative effects.We synthesized this information, along with information on species attributes, to develop a set of predictions of the conditions that lead to negative or positive effects or no effect of roads on animal abundance.Four species types are predicted to respond negatively to roads: (i) species that are attracted to roads and are unable to avoid individual cars; (ii) species with large movement ranges, low reproductive rates, and low natural densities; and (iii and iv) small animals whose populations are not limited by road-affected predators and either (a) avoid habitat near roads due to traffic disturbance or (b) show no avoidance of roads or traffic disturbance and are unable to avoid oncoming cars.Two species types are predicted to respond positively to roads: (i) species that are attracted to roads for an important resource (e.g., food) and are able to avoid oncoming cars, and (ii) species that do not avoid traffic disturbance but do avoid roads, and whose main predators show negative population-level responses to roads.Other conditions lead to weak or non-existent effects of roads and traffic on animal abundance.We identify areas where further research is needed, but we also argue that the evidence for populationlevel effects of roads and traffic is already strong enough to merit routine consideration of mitigation of these effects in all road construction and maintenance projects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-02815-140121

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,305

Metadata

Authors
Fahrig, L., & Rytwinski, T.
Venue
Ecology and Society
Published
2009
Volume
14
Issue
1
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W653200273
Cited by
1,305
References
0
FWCI
44.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Roads on Animal Abundance: an Empirical Review and Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-02815-140121
The paper
Fahrig, L., & Rytwinski, T. (2009). Effects of Roads on Animal Abundance: an Empirical Review and Synthesis. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02815-140121

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.