Cited by 501Indigenous Studies and EcologyEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and BeyondIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

Indigenous Knowledge, Science, and Resilience: What Have We Learned from a Decade of International Literature on "Integration"?

Open access
Bohensky, Erin L., Maru, Yiheyis·2011·Ecology and Society

Abstract

Bohensky, E. L., and Y. Maru. 2011. Indigenous knowledge, science, and resilience: what have we learned from a decade of international literature on “integration”? Ecology and Society 16(4): 6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04342-160406

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-04342-160406

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge integration aims to bridge multiple knowledges, bringing new information into an existing body of knowledge generally that which wields greater power, and to identify key similarities and differences so the latter can be minimized and knowledge consolidation simplified.

    “The process aims to bridge multiple knowledges, bringing new information into an existing body of knowledge (generally that which wields greater power; Hart, 2010), and to identify key similarities and differences so the latter can be minimized and knowledge consolidation simplified (Bohensky & Maru, 2011).”

    From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Bohensky & Maru, 2011

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohensky, E. L., & Maru, Y.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Venue
Ecology and Society
Published
2011
Volume
16
Issue
4
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002289717
Cited by
501
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 15
FWCI
36.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
indigenous knowledge, resilience, indigenous peoples, science-policy interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review