The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital Services Integration in Smart Cities: a Trusted Execution Environment Based Solution
Open accessAbstract
This paper elucidates the use of Trusted Execution Environments as a solution to the challenges of data security and privacy within the context of digital services integration in smart cities. This type of environment is engineered to safeguard sensitive data during execution, thereby guaranteeing that tasks involving such data are performed within isolated memory compartments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhancing interoperability in service consumption is integral to strengthening smart city governance.
“Enhancing interoperability in service consumption is integral to strengthening smart city governance (SCG), as it ensures adherence to service standards, data protection, security, and compliance, thereby fostering citizen trust and satisfaction (Hernández et al., 2020; Schuch et al., 2024).”
From Smart city governance and interoperability: enhancing human security in Yogyakarta and Makassar, Indonesia (2025) · cites this paper as Schuch et al., 2024
The Abstract says smart-city digital services must be interoperable and integrated, and that data flowing through integration processes must be protected against unauthorized access. It does not connect interoperability to stronger smart city governance or address service standards, compliance, citizen trust, or satisfaction. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., and Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM J. of R. and Dev., 54(4):1–16. · DOI
- Nam, T. and Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proc. 12th Annual Int’l Digital Government Research Conf.: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, page 282–291. · DOI
- Sabt, M., Achemlal, M., and Bouabdallah, A. (2015). Trusted execution environment: what it is, and what it is not. In 2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/Ispa, pages 57–64. · DOI · Paper page
- Watson, R. N., Moore, S. W., Sewell, P., and Neumann, P. G. (2019). An introduction to cheri. Technical report, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hardi, R., Nurmandi, A., Purwaningsih, T., & Manaf, H. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1553177 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuch, R., Frantz, R. Z., Bocanegra, J., Roos-Frantz, F., Sawicki, S., & Molina-Jiménez, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Anais do XXVII Congresso Ibero-Americano em Engenharia de Software (CIbSE 2024)
- Publisher
- Sociedade Brasileira de Computação
- Published
- 2024-05-06
- Pages
- 437-438
- OpenAlex
- W4399205938
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Congresso Ibero-Americano em Engenharia de Software (CIbSE) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (309425/2023-9, 402915/2023-2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- trusted execution environments, smart cities, data security, privacy, memory isolation, sensitive data protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
