Cited by 24Educational Leadership and PracticesSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Leadership for Low-Performing Schools: A Step-by-Step Guide to the School Turnaround Process

Duke, Daniel L.·2015·Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks

Abstract

No greater challenge faces our society than improving the educational opportunities for millions of young people trapped in chronically low-performing schools. Overcoming this challenge requires talented and dedicated school leaders whose knowledge and skills extend far beyond what is covered in conventional principal preparation programs. This book draws on extensive research by the author and others on the actions needed to turn around low-performing schools. First, however, the book examines the personal qualities needed to undertake the turnaround process. Following chapters provide guidelines on diagnosing the school-based causes of low achievement and developing a school turnaround plan. The author focuses on the importance of continuous planning – a departure from standard practice. A major portion of the book is devoted to examples of first-order and second-order strategies for raising achievement. Specific recommendations for launching the turnaround process and sustaining gains beyond the first years of turnaround are provided. The concluding chapter addresses the role of school districts in supporting school-based turnaround efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5771/9781475810264

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data use is identified as a common core characteristic of high-performing schools.

    “Data use is, for example, identified as a common core characteristic of high-performing schools (Duke, 2015;Ragland, Clubine, Constable, & Smith, 2002;Schaffer, Reynolds, & Stringfield, 2012;Snipes, Doolittle, & Herlihy, 2002).”

    From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as Duke, 2015

  • Long-term school improvement requires focus, continuous planning, and inquiry into the causes of problems using data.

    “Duke (2015) found that long-term school improvement requires focus, continuous planning, and inquiry into the causes of problems (e.g., low performance) using data.”

    From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as Duke (2015)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duke, D. L.
Corresponding author
Duke, Daniel L.
Venue
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks
Published
2015
OpenAlex
W4407549062
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.11
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
school turnaround, low-performing schools, school leadership, principal training, continuous planning, school improvement, achievement gap, school district support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review