Paternalism, coercion and manipulation in psychiatry
Abstract
Der vorliegende Band beleuchtet die Bedeutung des Prinzips der Menschenwürde für die ethische und rechtliche Beurteilung der neueren Entwicklungen im Bereich der Medizin aus der Perspektive unterschiedlicher Disziplinen. Er bezieht dabei insbesondere die aktuellen Probleme der medizinischen Praxis in diesen Zusammenhang ein und baut auf die im vorangehenden Band Nr. 50 dieser Reihe entwickelten theoretischen Überlegungen zur Relevanz von Menschenwürde und Menschenbild für die Medizin auf. Dabei wird deutlich, dass die Konzeption der Menschenwürde sich nicht einfach als ein quasi-religiöses Prinzip aus der medizinethischen Debatte verabschieden lässt, sondern dass sie – nicht nur wegen ihrer verfassungsrechtlichen Verankerung im deutschen Grundgesetz – bei angemessener Präzisierung zumindest als Leitidee für ethisches Handeln und Unterlassen im Bereich der Medizin dienen kann.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Critical psychiatry movements challenge the legitimacy of exclusive authority.
“At the core of critical psychiatry, the legitimacy of exclusive authority has been challenged (Bracken and Thomas, 2010;Roberts, 2005;Schramme, 2012).”
From Why adults with psychiatric conditions request euthanasia: A qualitative interview study of life experiences, motives and preventive factors (2021) · cites this paper as Schramme, 2012
Cites
Feinberg, J. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Paternalism: some second thoughts
Dworkin, G. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625206.009 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Autonomy and the Psychiatric Patient
Matthews, E. (2000) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/1468-5930.00140 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Gorr, M. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.1986.10717126 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Schramme, T. (2004) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110905762.94 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCoercive Treatment in Psychiatry
Kallert, T. W. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780199213962.003.0021 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Verhofstadt, M., Pardon, K., Audenaert, K., Deliens, L., Mortier, F., Liégeois, A., & Chambaere, K. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.032 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Autonomy, Perfectionism and the Justification of Education
Drerup, J. (2014) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-014-9426-3 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Prüter-Schwarte, C. (2019) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-019-00534-5 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jakovljević, A.-K., Hesse, D., & Wiesemann, C. (2016) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-016-0410-z · Cited by 6 · see citing works
What Exactly (If Anything) is Wrong with Paternalism Towards Children?
Drerup, J. (2020) · Philosophical Inquiry in Education · doi:10.7202/1070691ar · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schramme, T.
- Corresponding author
- Schramme, Thomas
- ORCID
- Schramme, Thomas
- Venue
- Menschenwürde in der Medizin: Quo vadis?
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 147-162
- OpenAlex
- W2486631134
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Keywords
- paternalism, coercion, manipulation, psychiatry, human dignity, medical ethics, German Basic Law, ethics of action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
