Whys and Wherefores of Transmissibility
Open accessAbstract
The present chapter draws a general overview on the concept of transmissibility and on its potentialities, virtues, limitations and possible applications. The notion of transmissibility has, for a long time, been limited to the single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system; it is only in the last ten years that the concept has evolved in a consistent manner to a generalized definition applicable to a multiple degree-of-freedom (MDOF) system. Such a generalization can be and has been not only developed in terms of a relation between two sets of harmonic responses for a given loading, but also between applied harmonic forces and corresponding reactions. Extensions to comply with random motions and random forces have also been achieved. From the establishment of the various formulations it was possible to deduce and understand several important properties, which allow for diverse applications that have been envisaged, such as evaluation of unmeasured frequency response functions (FRFs), estimation of reaction forces and detection of damage in a structure. All these aspects are reviewed and described in a logical sequence along this chapter. The notion of transmissibility is presented in every classic textbook on vibrations, associated to the single degree-of-freedom system, when its basis is moving harmonically; it is defined as the ratio between the modulus of the response amplitude and the modulus of the imposed amplitude of motion. Its study enhances some interesting aspects, namely the fact that beyond a certain imposed frequency there is an attenuation in the response amplitude, compared to the input one, i.e., one enters into an isolated region of the spectrum. This enables the design of modifications on the dynamic properties so that the system becomes “more isolated” than before, as its transmissibility has decreased. Usually, the transmissibility of forces, defined as the ratio between the modulus of the transmitted force magnitude to the ground and the modulus of the imposed force magnitude, is also deduced and the conclusion is that the mathematical formula of the transmissibility of forces is exactly the same as for the transmissibility of displacements. As it will be explained, this is not the case for multiple degree of freedom systems. The question that arises is how to extend the idea of transmissibility to a system with N degrees-of-freedom, i.e., how to relate a set of unknown responses to another set of known responses, for a given set of applied forces, or how to evaluate a set of reaction forces from a set of applied ones. Some initial attempts were given by Vakakis et al. (Paipetis & Vakakis, 1985; Vakakis, 1985; Vakakis & Paipetis, 1985; 1986), although that generalization was still
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transmissibility functions have a strong relationship with system damages and have been proposed as damage sensitive features.
“TFs have been shown to have a strong relationship with system damages and, as such, they have been proposed as damage sensitive features in several studies in the literature.”
From Vibration-based structural health monitoring exploiting a combination of convolutional neural networks and autoencoders for temperature effects neutralization (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Section 2.10 ('Other applications'; page unavailable) says several studies applied transmissibility to damage detection, supporting its use as a damage-sensitive feature. The discussion of Properties 1 and 2 shows that some mass or stiffness modifications leave the transmissibility matrix unchanged, so the paper does not support an unqualified strong relationship with system damage. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ON THE GENERALISATION OF THE TRANSMISSIBILITY CONCEPT
Ribeiro, A. M. R., Silva, J. M. M., & Maia, N. M. M. (2000) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1006/mssp.1999.1268 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
The use of transmissibility measurements in output-only modal analysis
Devriendt, C., & Guillaume, P. (2007) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.02.008 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Devriendt, C., Sitter, G. D., Vanlanduit, S., et al. (2008) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.07.009 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Devriendt, C., Sitter, G. D., & Guillaume, P. (2009) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.02.015 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
On the use of the transmissibility concept for the evaluation of frequency response functions
Urgueira, A. P. V., Almeida, R., & Maia, N. M. M. (2010) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.015 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
On the use of transmissibility measurements for finite element model updating
Steenackers, G., Devriendt, C., & Guillaume, P. (2007) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2007.01.030 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Transmissibility Matrix in Harmonic and Random Processes
Fontul, M., Ribeiro, A. M. R., Silva, J. M. M., & Maia, N. M. M. (2004) · Shock and Vibration · doi:10.1155/2004/438986 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Transmissibility properties of MODF systems
Liu, W., & Ewins, D. J. (1998) · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The effect of a viscously damped dynamic absorber on a linear multi-degree-of-freedom system
Vakakis, A. F., & Paipetis, S. A. (1986) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(86)90219-1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Single point vs multi point acceleration transmissibility concepts in vibration testing
Varoto, P. S., & McConnell, K. G. (1998) · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Application of Transmissibility Matrix Method to NVH Source Contribution Analysis
Tcherniak, D., Schuhmacher, A., & Sound, K. (2009) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Vibration Analysis and Control - New Trends and Developments
Beltrán-Carbajal, F. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/924 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Experimental evaluation of the transmissibility matrix
Ribeiro, A. M. R., Maia, N. M. M., & Silva, J. M. M. (1999) · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Using the Detection and Relative Damage Quantification Indicator (DRQ) with Transmissibility
Maia, N. M. M., Ribeiro, A. M. R., Fontul, M., Montalvão, D., & Sampaio, R. P. C. (2007) · Key engineering materials · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.347.455 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Structural Health Monitoring in Changing Operational Conditions Using Tranmissibility Measurements
Devriendt, C., Presezniak, F., Sitter, G. D., et al. (2010) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.3233/sav-2010-0556 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A method of analysis for unidirectional vibration isolators with many degrees of freedom
Paipetis, S. A., & Vakakis, A. F. (1985) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(85)90398-0 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Vakakis, A. F. (1985) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(85)90245-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Transmissibility based damage detection
Canales, G., Mevel, L., & Basseville, M. (2009) · INRIA a CCSD electronic archive server · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Transient response of unidirectional vibration isolators with many degrees of freedom
Vakakis, A. F., & Paipetis, S. A. (1985) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(85)90540-1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Understanding Transmissibility Properties
Almeida, R., & Urgueira, A. P. V. (2008) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Experimental Estimation of FRFs Using the Transmissibility Concept
Almeida, R., & Urgueira, A. P. V. (2008) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Using the Detection and Relative Damage Quantification Indicator (DRQ) with Transmissibility
Maia, N. M. M., Ribeiro, A. M. R., Fontul, M., et al. (2007) · Key engineering materials · doi:10.4028/0-87849-444-8.455 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Devriendt, C.M.G., Fontul, M. (2005). Transmissibility in Structural Coupling: Identification of the Sufficient Set of Coupling Forces, Proceedings of the 1st International Operational Modal Analysis Conference (IOMAC 1), Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Fontul, M. (2005). Transmissibility in Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (Ph. D Thesis).
- Liu, W. (2000). Structural Dynamic and Testing of Coupled Structures (Ph. D Thesis).
- Maia, N.M.M., Silva, J.M.M., Ribeiro, A.M.R. (1999). The Transmissibility Concept in Multi- Degree-of-Freedom Proceedings of Systems, Inverse Methods in Structural Dynamics, European Mechanics Colloquium, EUROMEC 401, Liverpool, UK.
- Maia, N.M.M., Silva, J.M.M., Ribeiro, A.M.R. (2001). The Transmissibility Concept in Multi- Degrees-of-Freedom Systems, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 129-137, ISSN: 0888-3270.
- Ribeiro, A.M.R., Fontul, M., Silva, J.M.M., Maia, N.M.M. (2002). Transmissibility Matrix in Harmonic and Random Processes, Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Dynamics Modelling (SDM), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.
- Ribeiro, A.M.R., Silva, J.M.M., Maia, N.M.M., Fontul, M. (2004). Transmissibility in Structural Coupling, Proceedings of International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA 2004), Leuven, Belgium.
- Ribeiro, A.M.R. (1998). On the Generalization of the Transmissibility Concept, Proceedings of the NATO/ASI Conference on Modal Analysis and Testing, Sesimbra, Portugal.
- Ribeiro, A.M.R., Fontul, M., Maia, N.M.M., Silva, J.M.M. (2005). Further Developments on the Transmissibility Concept for Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems, Scientific Bulletin of the «Politehnica» University of Timisoara, Transactions on Mechanics, Vol. 50, No. 64, pp. 1224-6077, Timisoara, Romania.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parziale, M., Lomazzi, L., Giglio, M., & Cadini, F. (2022) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.3076 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- M. Maia, N. M., V. Urgueira, A. P., & B. Almei, R. A.
- Venue
- Vibration Analysis and Control - New Trends and Developments
- Publisher
- InTech
- Published
- 2011-09-06
- OpenAlex
- W1581527253
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- InTech eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Contact-less Assessment of In-vivo Body Signals Using Microwave Doppler Radar (InTech) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mechanical Engineering Research and Applications
- Keywords
- transmissibility, multi-degree-of-freedom systems, frequency response function, reaction force estimation, damage detection, random vibration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review