The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robot Kinematics: Forward and Inverse Kinematics
Open accessAbstract
Kinematics studies the motion of bodies without consideration of the forces or moments that cause the motion. Robot kinematics refers the analytical study of the motion of a robot manipulator. Formulating the suitable kinematics models for a robot mechanism is very crucial for analyzing the behaviour of industrial manipulators. There are mainly two different spaces used in kinematics modelling of manipulators namely, Cartesian space and Quaternion space. The transformation between two Cartesian coordinate systems can be decomposed into a rotation and a translation. There are many ways to represent rotation, including the following: Euler angles, Gibbs vector, Cayley-Klein parameters, Pauli spin matrices, axis and angle, orthonormal matrices, and Hamilton 's quaternions. Of these representations, homogenous transformations based on 4x4 real matrices (orthonormal matrices) have been used most often in robotics. Denavit & Hartenberg (1955) showed that a general transformation between two joints requires four parameters. These parameters known as the Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) parameters have become the standard for describing robot kinematics. Although quaternions constitute an elegant representation for rotation, they have not been used as much as homogenous transformations by the robotics community. Dual quaternion can present rotation and translation in a compact form of transformation vector, simultaneously. While the orientation of a body is represented nine elements in homogenous transformations, the dual quaternions reduce the number of elements to four. It offers considerable advantage in terms of computational robustness and storage efficiency for dealing with the kinematics of robot chains (Funda et al., 1990). The robot kinematics can be divided into forward kinematics and inverse kinematics. Forward kinematics problem is straightforward and there is no complexity deriving the equations. Hence, there is always a forward kinematics solution of a manipulator. Inverse kinematics is a much more difficult problem than forward kinematics. The solution of the inverse kinematics problem is computationally expansive and generally takes a very long time in the real time control of manipulators. Singularities and nonlinearities that make the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Kinematic Notation for Lower-Pair Mechanisms Based on Matrices
Denavit, J., & Hartenberg, R. S. (1955) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.4011045 · Cited by 4,551
Introduction to ROBOTICS mechanics and control
Baillieul, J. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1987.1104613 · Cited by 1,074
Cited by
Werling, K., Bianco, N. A., Raitor, M., Stingel, J., Hicks, J. L., Collins, S. H., Delp, S. L., & Liu, C. K. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295152 · Cited by 65
Rey, V. F., Hevesi, P., Kovalenko, O., & Lukowicz, P. (2019) · Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1145/3341162.3345590 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Kucuk, S., & Bingul, Z.
- Venue
- Industrial Robotics: Theory, Modelling and Control
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- DOI
- 10.5772/5015
- OpenAlex
- W1605181360
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.