Cited by 178Imbalanced Data Classification TechniquesMachine Learning and Data ClassificationData Stream Mining Techniques

Learning Pattern Classification Tasks with Imbalanced Data Sets

Open access
Hoang, Giang, Bouzerdoum, Abdesselam, Lam, Son·2009·Pattern Recognition

Abstract

&RQFHSW FRPSOH[

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5772/7544

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SMOTE has significant drawbacks when the minority classes have a limited number of samples.

    “as SMOTE has significant drawbacks when the minority classes have a limited number of samples [58].”

    From Detecting Developers' Task Switches and Types (2022) · cites this paper as [58]

    Section 3.3 (Advanced sampling methods; page not provided) says that inadequate minority-class examples can make distribution estimates inaccurate, but it identifies this as a drawback of generative over-sampling, a variation of SMOTE. It does not establish that SMOTE itself has this drawback. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Alejo, R., García, V., Sotoca, J., Mollineda, R. & Sánchez, J. (2007). Improving the Performance of the RBF Neural Networks Trained with Imbalanced Samples, In Proceedings of Computational and Ambient Intelligence, 9th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 162-169, San Sebastian, Spain, 2007.
  2. Caruanan, R. (2000). Learning from Imbalanced Data: Rank Metrics and Extra Tasks, The AAAI Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets, pp. 51-57, 2000.
  3. Chong, E. K. P. & Zak, S. H. (1996) An Introduction to Optimization, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  4. Eavis, T. & Japkowicz, N. (2000). A Recognition-Based Alternative to Discrimination-Based Multi-layer Perceptrons, The 13th Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society on Computational Studies of Intelligence, pp. 280-292, London, UK, 2000, Springer-Verlag.
  5. Elkan, C. (2001). The Foundations of Cost-sensitive Learning, In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 73-978, 2001.
  6. Ertekin, S., Huang, J., Bottou, L. & Giles, C. L. (2007). Learning on the Border: Active Learning in Imbalanced Data Classification, In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 127-136, Lisbon, Portugal, 2007, ACM Press.
  7. Fawcett, T. (2006) An Introduction to ROC Analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 861-874.
  8. Guo, H. & Viktor, H. L. (2004) Learning from Imbalanced Data Dets with Boosting and Data Generation: the DataBoost-IM Approach. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 6, 30-39.
  9. Hagan, M. T. & Menhaj, M. B. (1994) Training Feedforward Networks with the Marquardt Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5, 989-993.
  10. Hido, S. & Kashima, H. (2008). Roughly Balanced Bagging for Imbalanced Data., In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 143-152, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2008.
  11. Holte, R., Acker, L. & Porter, B. (1989). Concept Learning and the Problem of Small Disjuncts, In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp., Austin, TX, USA, 1989, Morgan Kaufmann.
  12. Japkowicz, N. (2001). Concept-Learning in the Presence of Between-Class and Within-Class Imbalances, In Proceedings of the 14th Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society on Computational Studies of Intelligence, pp., London, UK, 2001, Springer-Verlag.
  13. Japkowicz, N., Mayers, C. & Gluck, M. (1995). A Novelty Detection Approach to Classification In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 518-523, 1995.
  14. Karagiannopoulos, M. G., Anyfantis, D. S., Kotsiantis, S. B. & Pintelas, P. E. (2007). Local Cost Sensitive Learning for Handling Imbalanced Data Sets, In Proceedings of Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, pp. 1-6, 2007.
  15. Kubat, M. & Matwin, S. (1997). Addressing the Curse of Imbalanced Training Set: One-sides Selection, In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 179-186, 1997, Morgan Kaufmann.
  16. Landgrebe, T., Pacli'k, P., Tax, D. J. M., Verzakov, S. & Duin, R. P. W. (2004). Cost-based Classifier Evaluation for Imbalanced Problems, In Proceedings of The 10th International Workshop on Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition and the 5th International Workshop on Statistical Techniques in Pattern Recognition, pp. 762-770, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  17. Leskovec, J. & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2003). Linear Programming Boosting for Uneven Datasets, In Proceedings of The twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning pp. 456-463, 2003, AAI Press.
  18. Ling, C. X. & Li, C. (2004). Decision Trees with Minimal Costs, In Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 69, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2004, ACM.
  19. Liu, A., Ghosh, J. & Martin, C. (2007). Generative Oversampling for Mining Imbalanced Datasets, In Proceedings of The 2007 International Conference on Data Mining, pp., Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2007, CSREA Press.
  20. Liu, Y. & Shriberg, E. (2007). Comparing Evaluation Metrics for Sentence Boundary Detection, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 185-188, 2007.
  21. Murphey, Y. L., Wang, H., Ou, G. & Feldkamp, L. (2007). OAHO: and Effective Algorithm for Multi-class Learning from Imbalanced Data, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 406-411, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2007, IEEE.
  22. Nguyen, C. & Ho, T. (2005). An Imbalanced Data Rule Learner, In Proceedings of The 9th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 617-624, Porto, Portugal, 2005.
  23. Nguyen, G. H., Bouzerdoum, A. & Phung, S. L. (2008). A Supervised Learning Approach for Imbalanced Data Sets, In Proceeding of International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 1-4, Florida, USA, 2008.
  24. Raskutti, B. & Kowalczyk, A. (2004) Extreme Re-balancing for SVMs: a Case Study. ACM Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, 6, 60-69.
  25. Riedmiller, M. & Braun, H. (1993). A Direct Adaptive Method of Faster Backpropagation Learning: The RPROP Algorithm, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 586-591, San Francisco, 1993.
  26. Su, C. & Hsiao, Y. (2007) An Evaluation of Robustness of MTS for Imbalanced Data. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19, 1321-1332.
  27. Tao, Q., Gao Wei Wu, Fei Yue Wang & Wang, J. (2005) Posterior Probability Support Vector Machines for Unbalanced Data. IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks, 16, 1561-1573.
  28. Visa, S. & Ralescu, A. (2005). The Effect of Imbalanced Data Class Distribution on Fuzzy Classifiers - Experimental Study, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 749-754, 2005.
  29. Wang, S. & Yao, X. (2009). Diversity Analysis on Imbalanced Data Sets by Using Ensemble Models, In Proceedings of The IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, pp. 324-331, 2009, IEEE.
  30. Weiss, G. M. (2004) Mining with Rarity: a Unifying Framework. SIGKDD Explorations and Newsletters, 6, 7-19.
  31. Weiss, G. M. & Provost, F. (2003) Learning When Training Data Are Costly: The Effect of Class Distribution on Tree Induction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 19, 315-354.
  32. Weng, C. G. & Poon, J. (2008). A New Evaluation Measure for Imbalanced Datasets, In Proceedings of The Seventh Australasian Data Mining Conference pp. 27-32, Glenelg, South Australia, 2008, ACS.
  33. Yoon, K. & Kwek, S. (2005). An Unsupervised Learning Approach to Resolving the Data Imbalanced Issue in Supervised Learning Problems in Functional Genomics, In Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, pp. 303-308, Washington, DC, USA, 2005, IEEE Computer Society.
  34. Yu, T., Jan, T., Simoff, S. & Debenham, J. (2007) A Hierarchical VQSVM for Imbalanced Data Sets. In Proceedings of The International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.
  35. Zhou, Z.-H. & Liu, X.-Y. (2006) Training Cost-sensitive Neural Networks with Methods Addressing The Class Imbalance Problem. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18, 63-77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoang, G., Bouzerdoum, A., & Lam, S.
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
InTech
Published
2009-10-01
OpenAlex
W2130745297
Cited by
178
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.47
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • InTech eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • IntechOpen (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Publikationsserver des Ibero-Amerikanischen Instituts Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
Keywords
pattern classification, class imbalance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review