Cited by 234Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesRestraint-Related Deaths

Use and Avoidance of Seclusion and Restraint: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Seclusion and Restraint Workgroup

Open access
Knox, Daryl, Holloman, Garland·2012·Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Issues surrounding reduction and/or elimination of episodes of seclusion and restraint for patients with behavioral problems in crisis clinics, emergency departments, inpatient psychiatric units, and specialized psychiatric emergency services continue to be an area of concern and debate among mental health clinicians. An important underlying principle of Project BETA (Best practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation) is noncoercive de-escalation as the intervention of choice in the management of acute agitation and threatening behavior. In this article, the authors discuss several aspects of seclusion and restraint, including review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines regulating their use in medical behavioral settings, negative consequences of this intervention to patients and staff, and a review of quality improvement and risk management strategies that have been effective in decreasing their use in various treatment settings. An algorithm designed to help the clinician determine when seclusion or restraint is most appropriate is introduced. The authors conclude that the specialized psychiatric emergency services and emergency departments, because of their treatment primarily of acute patients, may not be able to entirely eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint events, but these programs can adopt strategies to reduce the utilization rate of these interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6867

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of seclusion and restraint varies drastically between services, jurisdictions and countries, with up to 300-fold differences in the rate of use found in one review.

    “The use of seclusion and restraint also varies drastically between services, jurisdictions and countries, with up to 300-fold differences in the rate of use found in one review (91).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Use of Physical Restraint section reports that restraint use is significantly higher in emergency departments than in inpatient facilities, supporting variation between services. It does not report comparisons between jurisdictions or countries, or a review finding up to 300-fold differences in rates. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knox, D., & Holloman, G.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Venue
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
35-40
ISSN
  • 1936-900X (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-9018
OpenAlex
W2125055618
Cited by
234
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
Keywords
seclusion, physical restraint, de-escalation, acute agitation, psychiatric emergency care, emergency department, psychiatric ward, quality improvement, risk management, coercion in mental health care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review