Cited by 40Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Nonfatal firearm injuries by intent in the United States: 2016-2018 hospital discharge records from the healthcare cost and utilization project

Open access
Schnippel, Kathryn, Burd-Sharps, Sarah, Miller, Ted, Lawrence, Bruce, Swedler, David·2021·Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In addition to the nearly 40,000 firearm deaths each year, nonfatal firearm injuries represent a significant public health burden to communities in the United States. We aimed to describe the incidence and rates of nonfatal firearm injuries. METHODS: We calculated nonfatal firearm injury estimates using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, including the Nationwide Emergency Department Samples and the National Inpatient Samples. We used the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification to identify firearm injury episodes. Deaths in the emergency department (ED) or as inpatients were excluded. RESULTS: In addition to the 118,171 persons shot and killed by firearms from 2016-2018, 228,380 people were shot (ratio 1.9:1) and treated at a hospital ED or admitted to hospital, a rate of 23.4 nonfatal firearm injury episodes per 100,000 population. The number of nonfatal injury episodes varied by year: 2018 had the lowest at 69,692, compared to 84,776 in 2017 and 73,912 in 2016. Unintentional injury episodes were the most frequent, accounting for 58.5% (n = 81,217) and 38.9% (n = 34,820) of total nonfatal firearm hospital discharges from the ED and inpatients, respectively. Assault episodes were the next most frequent, at 36.3% (n = 50,482) of ED and 49.5% (n = 44,290) of inpatient discharges. The highest rate of nonfatal firearm injury by five-year age group was for 20- to 24-year-olds. With an annual rate of 73.53 per 100,000 population, the rates for ages 20-24 were more than 10 times higher than the rates for patients younger than 15 or 60 years and older. More than half (53.4%, n = 121,884) of hospital-treated, nonfatal firearm injury episodes were patients living in ZIP codes with a median household income in the lowest quartile, compared to 7.5% (n = 17,102) for patients residing in the highest income quartile ZIP codes, a sevenfold difference. CONCLUSION: For every person shot and killed by a gun in the US, two more are wounded. Unlike firearm deaths, which are predominantly suicides, most nonfatal firearm injury episodes are unintentional or with an assault intent. Having a reliable source of nonfatal injury data is essential to understanding the incidence of firearm injuries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.51925

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two proxy measures commonly used in the existing literature are ED visits and time between firearm injury encounters.

    “Two proxy measures commonly used in the existing body of literature are (1) ED visits and (2) time between firearm injury encounters.2,4-9”

    From Machine learning classification of new firearm injury encounters in the St Louis region: 2010-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion describes prior analyses based on emergency-department visits, supporting ED visits as a measure used in the literature. It also mentions 30- and 90-day readmissions, but does not identify time between firearm injury encounters as a commonly used proxy measure. The Methods and Results count injury episodes rather than measuring intervals between them. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [5]Ingram DD Franco SJ 2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics 2014 24776070
  2. [8]Avraham J Frangos S DiMaggio C The epidemiology of firearm injuries managed in US emergency departments Inj Epidemiol 2018 5 1 1 6 30318556 PMC6186529
  3. [10]Kalesan B Zuo Y Xuan Z A multi-decade joinpoint analysis of firearm injury severity Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2018 3 1 e000139 29766128 PMC5887778
  4. [11]Peek-Asa C Butcher B Cavanaugh JE Cost of hospitalization for firearm injuries by firearm type, intent, and payer in the United States Inj Epidemiol 2017 4 1 20 28721637 PMC5515719
  5. [12]Gani F Sakran JV Canner JK Emergency department visits for firearm-related injuries in the United States, 2006–14 Health Aff 2017 36 10 1729 38 28971917
  6. [13]Miller TR Cohen MA Costs of gunshot and cut/stab wounds in the United States, with some Canadian comparisons Accid Anal Prev 1997 29 3 329 41 9183471
  7. [21]Rattan R Parreco J Namias N Pust G Yeh D Zakrison T Hidden costs of hospitalization after firearm injury: national analysis of different hospital readmission Ann Surg 2018 267 5 810 15 28922206
  8. [22]Kalesan B Zuo Y Vasan RS Risk of 90-day readmission in patients after firearm injury hospitalization: a nationally representative retrospective cohort study J Inj Violence Res 2019 11 1 65 80 30686818 PMC6420916
  9. [23]Spitzer SA Vail D Tennakoon L Readmission risk and costs of firearm injuries in the United States, 2010–2015 PLOS ONE 2019 14 1 e0209896 30677032 PMC6345420
  10. [24]Vella MA Warshauer A Tortorello G Long-term functional, psychological, emotional, and social outcomes in survivors of firearm injuries JAMA Surg 2019 155 1 1 9 PMC6902182 31746949
  11. [25]Purtle J Rich LJ Bloom SL Cost−benefit analysis simulation of a hospital-based violence intervention program Am J Prev Med 2015 48 2 162 69 25442223
  12. [26]Mueller KL Naganathan S Griffey RT Counseling on Access to Lethal Means-Emergency Department (CALM-ED): a quality improvement program for firearm injury prevention West J Emerg Med 2020 21 5 1123 30 32970565 PMC7514406
  13. [28]McKenzie K Fingerhut L Walker S Classifying external causes of injury: history, current approaches, and future directions Epidemiol Rev 2012 34 1 4 16 22045696

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnippel, K., Burd-Sharps, S., Miller, T., Lawrence, B., & Swedler, D.
Affiliations
Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
Corresponding author
Schnippel, Kathryn
Venue
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2021-06-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
462-470
ISSN
1936-900X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3171981133
Cited by
40
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
nonfatal firearm injuries, injury intent, unintentional firearm injury, emergency department visits, household income disparities, firearm injury prevention, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Firearms, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Wounds, Gunshot, Injury Severity Score, Incidence, Age Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review