Developing Master Adaptive Learners: Implementation of a Coaching Program in Graduate Medical Education
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUNDMedical knowledge is expanding exponentially, outpacing the information that can be learned during medical training.1 To keep pace with this rapid acceleration of new information, physicians must continually address practice gaps and adapt to novel situations.2,3 Unfortunately, studies demonstrate physicians frequently perform inaccurate self-assessments and generate learning goals discordant with gaps. 4 This suboptimal approach to learning is attributed, in part, to medical training not preparing physicians to be effective learners and highlights the need to teach learners to learn.2,[5][6] Despite this, there is a paucity of published curricula or programs delineating how to train trainees to learn effectively.This imperative for continuous learning is palpable in the complex and challenging clinical setting of the emergency department (ED).The acuity, fast pace, and variability in patient presentations require physicians to nimbly adapt to novel challenges.7 These same factors that make effective, continuous learning necessary to provide high-quality patient care also make the ED a challenging place to learn.7 Therefore, this intervention focused specifically on a novel coaching approach to develop life-long learning skills in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows at a large academic center. PROGRAM DESIGNWe performed a needs assessment in December 2020-January 2021 of our PEM fellows to identify their current approach to learning and application of MAL skills.One author (MW) performed semi-structured interviews with three recent graduates, four fellows, and one incoming fellow.We performed focus groups with faculty to understand their approach to fellow education, direct observation, feedback, and learning plan development.The fellows lacked a defined approach to learning and pointed to infrequent and poor-quality feedback as barriers to identifying gaps.The faculty cited multiple challenges to providing feedback and
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coach compensation includes recognition.
“| Coach compensation | Recognition | [112,122,128] | |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [112]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Van Harrison, R., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1094 · Cited by 2,375 · see citing works
Challenges and opportunities facing medical education.
Densen, P. (2011) · PubMed Central · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Preparation for future learning: a missing competency in health professions education?
Mylopoulos, M., Brydges, R., Woods, N. N., Manzone, J. C., & Schwartz, D. L. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12893 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Exploring the characteristics and context that allow Master Adaptive Learners to thrive
Cutrer, W. B., Atkinson, H. G., Friedman, E. S., Deiorio, N. M., Gruppen, L. D., Dekhtyar, M., & Pusic, M. V. (2018) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2018.1484560 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Maintaining competence in the field: Learning about practice, through practice, in practice
Regehr, G., & Mylopoulos, M. (2008) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.203 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Regan, L. A., Hopson, L. R., Gisondi, M. A., & Branzetti, J. B. (2019) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2019.1630729 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
In-the-Moment Feedback and Coaching: Improving R2C2 for a New Context
Lockyer, J., Armson, H., Könings, K. D., Lee-Krueger, R. C. W., Ordons, A. R. D., Ramani, S., Trier, J., Zetkulic, M., & Sargeant, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-19-00508.1 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Finessing Feedback: Recommendations for Effective Feedback in the Emergency Department
Buckley, C., Natesan, S. M., Breslin, A. W., & Gottlieb, M. A. (2019) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.016 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Regan, L. A., Hopson, L. R., Gisondi, M. A., & Branzetti, J. B. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03200-5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Training Future Family Physicians to Become Master Adaptive Learners
Edje, L. C., & Price, D. W. (2021) · Family Medicine · doi:10.22454/fammed.2021.192268 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [5]The Coalition for Physician Accountability The Coalition for Physician Accountability’s Undergraduate Medical Medical Education Review Committee (UGRC): recommendations for comprehensive improvement of the UME-GME transition 2021 Available at: https://physicianaccountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/UGRC-Coalition-Report-FINAL.pdf Accessed May 17, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
<scp>AI</scp>‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3221 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Mukherjee, B., Pfleeger, J., Custodio, H., Roca, M. R., Khalsa, G., & Clanton, C. (2026) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2026.2687304 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wolff, M., Hammoud, M., & Carney, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wolff, Margaret
- Venue
- Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 2023-01-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-75
- ISSN
- 1936-900X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9897244
- OpenAlex
- W4318182841
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency Medicine Education and Research
- Keywords
- adaptive learning, coaching programs, graduate medical education, residency training, learner development, emergency medicine residency
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Program Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review