The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developing a Strategy Map to Improve Public Hospitals Performance with Balanced Scorecard and DEMATEL Approach
Open accessAbstract
Background: The hospital is a significant part of health systems that presents a complex and vital services. Therefore, performance management of hospitals should be considered especially. BSC model is so helpful and popular for performance management. In using BSC, cause and effect relations is very important, since it helps to apply non-financial to forecast financial performance. Objectives: This study aims to analysis systematic relations between key indicators of hospital performance evaluation, identifying causal relations and prioritizing indicators. Methods: Based on the 4 perspectives described by the balanced scorecard (BSC), the evaluation indicators of hospital performance and key performance indicators (KPIs) were adopted from the related literature and selected by experts’ panel, respectively. Then, the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was employed for the determination of the cause-and-effect relationships between the indicators, differentiation of the effective and significant factors, and construction of the strategy map to ameliorate hospital performance. Results: According to the BSC perspectives, 21 KPIs were selected for evaluation of hospital performance. The highest relationship was found between bed occupancy having the largest R + D value and other indicators, thus illustrating its fundamental role among the indicators. Clinical errors with the greatest value of R - D showed the strongest impacts on the other indicators and was thus named as the “main cause factor” among the indicators. In contrast, the percentage of patient satisfaction with the smallest R - D value was most strongly influenced by the other indicators and therefore, it was known as the “main effect factor” among the indicators. Conclusions: Assessment and improvement of the hospital performance is a complex and multi-dimensional activity. In order to have a powerful assessment system and success in improving hospital performance, instead of a single-dimension, it should be paying attention to all dimensions of performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The financial perspective has been adopted by most of the studies that focus on BSC design [50,68,69,77].”
From The Evolution of Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Its Design, Implementation, Use, and Review (2022) · cites this paper as [77]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.4066/AMJ.2011.620 · DOI
- Bastani P, 2013, Iran J Public Health., 42, 876
- Markazi-Moghaddam N, 2016, Iran J Public Health., 45, 843
- 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01101-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.007 · DOI
- Lee JY, 2012, Combining balanced scorecard and data envelopment analysis in kitchen employees performance measurement: An exploratory study.
- 10.1186/1472-6963-14-448 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053021.93198.96 · DOI
- Nikjoo RG, 2013, J Commun Health Res., 2, 30
- 10.4103/2277-9531.94408 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004010-200610000-00003 · DOI
- 10.1108/ijppm-02-2015-0029 · DOI
- Rababa'h A, 2014, Int Rev Manag BusRes., 3, 174
- Niven PR, 2002, Balanced scorecard step-by-step: maximizing performance and maintaining results.
- Kocakulah MC, 2007, J Health Care Finance., 34, 72
- 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00713-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chieco.2014.05.003 · DOI
- Liu YM, 2017, Using balanced scorecard to help improving the quality of care and service for the private clinics in Taiwan.
- 10.1108/13683040510634808 · DOI
- 10.1108/jamr-12-2012-0051 · DOI
- Iravani Tabrizipour AP, 2012, Health Inf Manage., 9, 327
- Rahimi H, 2014, Int J Hosp Res., 3, 199
- Rahimi H, 2016, J Health Manag Inf., 4, 17
- 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.009 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph14080934 · DOI
- 10.1111/chd.12190 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12913-016-1327-4 · DOI
- Huang JA, 2004, J Chin Med Assoc., 67, 403
- 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.900597 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005131 · DOI
- 10.1002/nop2.54 · DOI
- Onuoha PC, 2016, Asian J Sci Technol., 7, 2944
- 10.1111/ijn.12471 · DOI
- 10.1093/intqhc/mzr069 · DOI
- 10.1245/s10434-007-9579-1 · DOI
- 10.1186/2045-4015-2-40 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.03.025 · DOI
- 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181a3b709 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jocn.13341 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.HMR.0000267789.17309.18 · DOI
- 10.1108/14636680810855991 · DOI
- Nelson EC, 1992, Mark Health Serv., 12, 6
- Janati A, 2014, J Clin Res Gov., 3, 92
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Betto, F., Sardi, A., Garengo, P., & Sorano, E. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191610291 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahimi, H., Bahmaei, J., Shojaei, P., Kavosi, Z., & Khavasi, M.
- Affiliations
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Abadan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Shiraz University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Kavosi, Zahra
- Venue
- Shiraz E-Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Brieflands
- Published
- 2018-06-11
- Volume
- In Press
- Issue
- In Press
- ISSN
- 1735-1391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807999822
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Shiraz E-Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Shiraz University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Organizational Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
- Keywords
- hospital performance, public hospitals, balanced scorecard, strategic map, DEMATEL, key performance indicators, causal relationship, indicator prioritization, hospital bed occupancy, medical errors, patient satisfaction, performance management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review