Machine Learning in Cyberbullying Detection from Social-Media Image or Screenshot with Optical Character Recognition
Open accessAbstract
Along with the growth of the Internet, social media usage has drastically expanded. As people share their opinions and ideas more frequently on the Internet and through various social media platforms, there has been a notable rise in the number of consumer phrases that contain sentiment data. According to reports, cyberbullying frequently leads to severe emotional and physical suffering, especially in women and young children. In certain instances, it has even been reported that sufferers attempt suicide. The bully may occasionally attempt to destroy any proof they believe to be on their side. Even if the victim gets the evidence, it will still be a long time before they get justice at that point. This work used OCR, NLP, and machine learning to detect cyberbullying in photos in order to design and execute a practical method to recognize cyberbullying from images. Eight classifier techniques are used to compare the accuracy of these algorithms against the BoW Model and the TF-IDF, two key features. These classifiers are used to understand and recognize bullying behaviors. Based on testing the suggested method on the cyberbullying dataset, it was shown that linear SVC after OCR and logistic regression perform better and achieve the best accuracy of 96 percent. This study aid in providing a good outline that shapes the methods for detecting online bullying from a screenshot with design and implementation details.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It was difficult to set a threshold for detecting cyberbullying due to bias towards the non-cyberbullying class.
“Furthermore, it was difficult to set a threshold for detecting cyberbullying due to bias towards the non-cyberbullying class [113].”
From Cyberbullying detection: Exploring datasets, technologies, and approaches on social media platforms (2026) · cites this paper as [113]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- A.Saravanaraj, J. I. Sheeba, S. Pradeep Devaneyan, 2016. Automatic Detection of Cyberbullying from twitter. IRACST - International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology & Security (IJCSITS), ISSN.
- Hani, J., Nashaat, M., Ahmed, M., Emad, Z., Amer, E. and Mohammed, A., 2019. Social media cyberbullying detection using machine learning. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl, 10(5), pp.703-707.
- Authors
- Department of Computer Science, A. I. U.-B., Sultan, T., Jahan, N., Basak, R., Jony, M. S. A., & Nabil, R. H.
- Affiliations
- American International University-Bangladesh (BD)
- Venue
- International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications
- Publisher
- MECS Publisher
- Published
- 2023-04-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 2074-904X (ISSN-L)
- 2074-9058
- OpenAlex
- W4382749503
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- cyberbullying detection, social media images, screenshots, optical character recognition, text extraction from images, text classification, linear support vector machine, logistic regression, bag-of-words, TF-IDF, cyberbullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review