Cited by 9Educational Technology and AssessmentOnline Learning and AnalyticsEdcuational Technology Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analyzing Students’ Performance Using Fuzzy Logic and Hierarchical Linear Regression

Open access
Thanh Loan, Dao Thi, Duy Tho, Nguyen, Huu Nghia, Nguyen, Chien, Vu Dinh, Anh Tuan, Tran·2024·International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 situation, all activities, including education, were shifted to online platforms.Consequently, instructors encountered increased challenges in evaluating students.In traditional assessment methods, instructors often face ambiguous cases when evaluating students' competencies.Recent research has focused on the effectiveness of fuzzy logic in assessing students' competencies, considering the presence of uncertain factors or multiple variables.Additionally, demographic characteristics, which can potentially influence students' performance, are not typically utilized as inputs in the fuzzy logic method.Therefore, analyzing students' performance by incorporating these factors is crucial in suggesting adjustments to teaching and learning strategies.In this study, we employ a combination of fuzzy logic and hierarchical linear regression to analyze students' performance.The experiment involved 318 students from various programs and showed that the hybrid approach assessed students' performance with greater nuance and adaptability when compared to a traditional method.Moreover, the findings in this study revealed the following: 1) There are differences in students' performance between traditional and fuzzy evaluation methods; 2) The learning method is an impact on students' fuzzy grades; 3) Students studying online do not perform better than those studying onsite.These findings suggest that instructors and educators should explore effective strategies being fair and suitable in assessment and learning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5815/ijmecs.2024.01.01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Thanh Loan, D. T., Duy Tho, N., Huu Nghia, N., Chien, V. D., & Anh Tuan, T.
Affiliations
University of Da Nang (VN)
Venue
International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science
Published
2024-02-08
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 2075-0161 (ISSN-L)
  • 2075-017X
OpenAlex
W4391436122
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
Keywords
student assessment, online learning, COVID-19 remote learning, competency assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review