Review the Prospects and Obstacles of AIEnhanced Learning Environments: The Role ofChatGPT in Education
Open accessAbstract
This paper delves into the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly focusing on ChatGPT, within educational realms.By conducting an exhaustive review across various scholarly publications and case studies, this research unveils ChatGPT's multifaceted role in redefining educational landscapes-ranging from enhancing programming proficiency and fostering creativity in writing, to augmenting student engagement.Our findings illuminate the dual-edged influence of ChatGPT in education, showcasing not only its ability to tailor learning experiences and facilitate programming and creative writing but also its capacity to fortify student-teacher interactions.However, the study does not shy away from highlighting the intricate challenges that accompany the integration of AI in education, including concerns over academic integrity, ethical considerations, and the need for a balanced amalgamation with traditional pedagogical methods.Innovatively, this research proposes a forward-thinking, ethical framework for AI integration in educational settings, advocating for a harmonious blend of ChatGPT's capabilities with human educators' insights to foster a more engaging, effective, and equitable learning environment.By introducing groundbreaking strategies for integrating interactive learning technologies with ChatGPT, and emphasizing the development of personalized educational trajectories, our study sets a new benchmark for future AI applications in education.The paper's exploration into the innovative integration of ChatGPT with Virtual Reality (VR) offers a glimpse into the future of immersive learning experiences, opening new avenues for engaging and experiential learning.Through empirical validation and a nuanced discussion on the ethical deployment of AI tools in education, this study marks a significant contribution to the discourse on AI's role in education, providing valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and technologists alike.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the existing research on ChatGPT in education is conducted under controlled or simulated conditions, often outside authentic classroom settings.
“Much of the existing research on ChatGPT in education is conducted under controlled or simulated conditions, often outside of authentic classroom settings [54].”
From Fluency Illusion: A Review on Influence of ChatGPT in Classroom Settings (2026) · cites this paper as [54]
The Literature Review describes individual case studies, experiments, and surveys, but does not say that much of the research was conducted under controlled or simulated conditions or outside authentic classrooms. The Problem Statement discusses ChatGPT’s limitations relative to a physical classroom, not the settings in which existing research was conducted. Searches for controlled or simulated studies and real-classroom evaluation did not establish the claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- N. M. S. Surameery and M. Y. Shakor, Use chat GPT to solve programming bugs. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Engineering (IJITC). 2023, 3(1), 17-22.
- A. Özcan, and Polat, S. Artificial Intelligence and Chat Bots in Academic Research . Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Language, 3202 , 3(1), 81-90, https://doi.org/10.20375/0000-000f-ff1e-2. · DOI
- M. Shidiq, The use of artificial intelligence-based chat-gpt and its challenges for the world of education; from the viewpoint of the development of creative writing skills, Proceeding of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 353- 357.
- A. M. A. Ausat, B. Massang, M. Efendi, N. Nofirman, and Y. Riady, Can chat GPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 2023, 5(4), 16100-16106.
- S. Batra and S. Verma, To Study the Impact of ChatGPT Tool on Academic Learning: Perspective of Students and Teachers in Higher Education. Journal of Informatics Education and Research. 20,23, 3(2), 1969-1977.
- Y. Wardat et al., A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023,19(7), 1-18.
- Sá nchez-Ruiz et al., ChatGPT Challenges Blended Learning Methodologies in Engineering Education: A Case Study in Mathematics. Applied Sciences. 2023,13(10), 1-22.
- M. M. Rahman an Y. Watanobe, ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences. 2023, 13(9), 1-21.
- C. K. Lo. What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences. 2023; 13(4), 1-15.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hui-li, Y. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102136 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Kayyali, M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8332-2.ch002 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Aljasser, A. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13649-8 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“These aspects are useful to complement the role of human feed-back (Alshahrani & Qureshi, 2024).”
AI vs. Human Writing: Developing a Novel Method for Text Authenticity Detection in Education
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, R. I. O. T., Kalmani, V. H., Adamuthe, A. C., Premnath Gondil, A., Prashant Patil, V., Amar Kore, R., & Mahadev Metkari, V. (2025) · International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science · doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2025.03.04 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fluency Illusion: A Review on Influence of ChatGPT in Classroom Settings
Kumar, S., Mikayelyan, A., & Vorfolomeyeva, O. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17030299 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
George-Reyes, C. E., Rumbaut-Rangel, D., Fernández, M. B., & Oliva-Córdova, L. M. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17060616 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Demystifying Issues and Concerns of AI and Allied Technologies in Digital Education and Learning
Paul, P., Bommali, T., Kayyali, M., Chakraborty, S., Debnath, D., Gupta, S. K., & Sharma, S. K. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3952-8.ch001 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Joshi, D. R., Khanal, B. P., Chapai, K. P. S., & Singh, A. B. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102235 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Leveraging a Multi-agent LLM-Based System to Educate Teachers in Hate Incidents Management
Gajewska, E., Wawer, M., Budzyńska, K., & Chudziak, J. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98462-4_42 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Multimodal AI-Enhanced Educational Assistant with Real-Time Q&A and Dynamic Learning Support
Dhathrinadh, M., Gupta, M., & Sasikala, T. (2025) · International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS) · doi:10.1109/iciss63372.2025.11076197 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Alshahrani and Qureshi [5] reviewed the role of AI-enhanced environments, highlighting the importance of overcoming such obstacles to ensure a cohesive and interactive learning experience.”
Sun, N. (2026) · Australian Journal of Electrical & Electronics Engineering · doi:10.1080/1448837x.2026.2618423 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
MRAYYAN, M. T., & Alomari, A. K. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/9885653 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hasanein, A. M., & Al‐Romeedy, B. S. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17030303 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Revolutionizing Fashion Education With Integrating AI and 3D Design for a Sustainable Future
Singh, N., & Rani, J. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5102-5.ch007 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Saleem, N. H., & Wisker, Z. L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01638-6_4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Elsamanoudy, A., Alhazimi, A. M., Hassanien, M. A., Almarabheh, A. J., Al-Aqidi, S., Alwalidi, R., & Alrefaie, Z. A. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09088-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Proposal for AI-Driven Method for Strategic Business Decision-Making
Ticina, E. (2025) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80935-4_18
The Limits of AI in Teaching Partition Literature
Bisht, P., & Pujari, J. P. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0122-8.ch003
Rais, S., Maliki, S. E., & Boussouf, Z. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07785-1_20
A bibliometric analysis of communication skills among social sciences students in higher education
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Panya, N. (2026) · Priviet Social Sciences Journal · doi:10.55942/pssj.v6i1.719
“ChatGPT and AI have shown a significant surge because these technologies enable more personalized and interactive teaching, as well as improving the accessibility of learning at various levels of health education (Alshahrani & Qureshi, 2024; Mema et al., 2023; Yu, 2024).”
Rahmi, U., Santoso, Y., & Azrul, A. (2026) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-10-2025-0296 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Gemini and Mathematics Education
Mazı, A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407445
Balancing AI ‐Driven Efficiency and Human Expertise in Higher Education
Albannai, N. A. A., Raziq, M. M., Scott‐Kennel, J., Rice, J. L., & Nusairi, A. M. A. (2026) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.70110
Razak, N. A., Abidin, M. I. Z., Razak, A. A., Assad, A., & El-Gendi, H. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15070441
Omeh, C. B., Valentine Joseph Owan, P. D., Sanusi, I. T., & Olade, I. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01707-0
“This result aligns with the observations of [35, 36] who found that AI-driven feedback improves learners’ capacity for analytical reasoning.”
Exploring awareness and use of AI tools among university teachers in Nepal: a qualitative study
Chapai, K. P. S., Kandel, R. K., & Joshi, D. R. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2715835
Development for AI Adoption Inclusive and Equitable AI in Diverse Learning Environments
Shukla, T. D., Priyadharshini, D. B. I., Anand, S. K., Sarkar, R., Nagapillai, P., Vahalingam, R., & Bhoopathy, V. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-3663-1.ch010
Bekešienė, S. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18178758
Luo, X., Zhou, W., Zhang, C., & Zhang, R. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2721390
Guo, J., Ren, J., Lu, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Su, H., Ding, L., Zhang, S., Zhang, N., Pan, S., et al. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14091100
- Authors
- Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, K. A. U., Alshahrani, K., & Jameel Qureshi, R.
- Affiliations
- King Abdulaziz University (SA)
- Venue
- International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science
- Publisher
- MECS Publisher
- Published
- 2024-08-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 71-86
- ISSN
- 2075-0161 (ISSN-L)
- 2075-017X
- OpenAlex
- W4401188518
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 10
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in education, programming education, creative writing, student engagement, academic integrity, AI ethics, personalized learning, human-AI collaboration, virtual reality in education, immersive learning, student-teacher interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
