CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84African cultural and philosophical studiesRace, History, and American SocietyAfro-Latin American Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Afrarealism and the Black Matrix: Maroon Philosophy at Democracy's Border

James, Joy·2013·The Black Scholar
DOI 10.5816/blackscholar.43.4.0124
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

(2013). Afrarealism and the Black Matrix. The Black Scholar: Vol. 43, The Role of Black Philosophy, pp. 124-131.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5816/blackscholar.43.4.0124

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
James, J.
Affiliations
Joy James is the F. C. Oakley Third Century Chair, Professor in Humanities and of political science at Williams College. Her most recent book is Seeking the Beloved Community: A Feminist Race Reader (Albany: SUNY Press, 2013).
Corresponding author
James, Joy
Venue
The Black Scholar
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-12
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
124-131
ISSN
  • 0006-4246 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-5387
DOI
10.5816/blackscholar.43.4.0124
OpenAlex
W4236533115
Semantic Scholar
d60f56857a47e514bc311e751d05373d5f58eb52
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Black Scholar (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › African cultural and philosophical studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
Keywords
black matrix, Black aesthetics, Black philosophy, African American thought

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review