The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities?
Open accessAbstract
Due to different reasons cities are increasingly challenged to improve their competitiveness. Different strategic efforts are discussed in planning sciences, new approaches and instruments are elaborated and applied, steering the positioning of cities in a competitive urban world. As one specific consequence city rankings have experienced a remarkable boom. However, there is some evidence that public attention of city rankings is mainly concentrated simply on the ranks themselves totally neglecting its meaning as an instrument for strategic planning. In order to elaborate this potential meaning of rankings the paper gives an overview of different types and introduces an own approach called ‘Smart City ranking’. Based on this ranking approach and corresponding experiences of different cities reacting on its dissemination in the second part the paper shows how this approach can be used as an effective instrument detecting strengths and weaknesses and improving a city’s competitiveness through relevant strategic efforts. Per diferents motius, les ciutats es troben cada vegada en major mesura front el repte de millorar la seva competitivitat. Diferents esforços estratègics són discutits en les ciències del planejament, nous enfocaments i instruments són elaborats i posats en pràctica, guiant el posicionament de les ciutats en un competitiu món urbà. Una conseqüència específica d’això és que la categorització de ciutats ha experimentat un augment notable. No obstant, hi ha certs indicis de que l’atenció pública respecte de la categorització de ciutats es centra principalment en les últimes posicions, oblidant completament la seva significança com instrument de planificació estratègica. Amb la finalitat de desenvolupar aquesta potencial significança de les categoritzacions, l’article fa un repàs de diferents tipus i presenta una aproximació pròpia anomenada “Smart City Ranking”. Basat en aquest enfocament a la categorització i les corresponents experiències de la reacció de diferents ciutats respecte a la seva difusió, en una segona part l’article mostra com aquesta aproximació pot ser utilitzada com instrument eficaç, reconeixent fortaleses i debilitats i millorant la competitivitat de les ciutats a través d’esforços estratègics adequats. Por diferentes motivos, las ciudades se encuentran cada vez en mayor medida ante el reto de mejorar su competitividad. Distintos esfuerzos estratégicos son discutidos en las ciencias del planeamiento, nuevos enfoques e instrumentos son elaborados y puestos en práctica, guiando el posicionamiento de las ciudades en un mundo urbano competitivo. Una consecuencia específica de ello es que la categorización de ciudades ha experimentado un auge notable. Sin embargo, hay ciertos indicios de que la atención sobre la jerarquización de ciudades se centra principalmente en las últimas posiciones, olvidando completamente su significancia como instrumento de planificación estratégica. Con el fin de desarrollar esta potencial significancia este artículo hace un repaso de distintos tipos y presenta una aproximación propia llamada “Smart City Ranking”. Basado en este enfoque a la categorización y las correspondientes experiencias de la reacción de diferentes ciudades en cuanto a su difusión, en una segunda parte el artículo muestra como esta aproximación puede ser utilizada como un instrumento eficaz, reconociendo fortalezas y debilidades y mejorando la competitividad de las ciudades a través de esfuerzos estratégicos adecuados.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Begg, I. (1999) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/0042098993222 · Cited by 517
City-ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Meijers, E., Fertner, D. I. C., & Dr, D. I. (2008) · Cited by 459
Self-citationJessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2000) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980020002814 · Cited by 449
Storper, M. (1995) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 144
Political Conflict and Lesson-Drawing
Robertson, D. (1991) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x00004931 · Cited by 128
The Politics of Policy Borrowing
Robertson, D. (1993) · Cited by 62
Towards a Concept of Territorial Capital
Camagni, R. P. (2007) · Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) · Cited by 51
Cited by
Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives
Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015) · Journal of Urban Technology · doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 · Cited by 3,536
Smart city policies: A spatial approach
Angelidou, M. (2014) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007 · Cited by 986
A literature survey on smart cities
Yin, C., Xiong, Z., Chen, H., Wang, J., Cooper, D., & David, B. (2015) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-015-5397-4 · Cited by 734
Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities
Sun, J., Yan, J., & Zhang, K. Z. K. (2016) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-016-0040-y · Cited by 552
A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets
Sharifi, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H.
- Venue
- ACE: Architecture, City and Environment
- Publisher
- Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7-26
- ISSN
- 1886-4805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1608558570
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5821/ace.v4i12.2483
- The paper
- Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: Architecture, City and Environment. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.v4i12.2483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.