Cited by 6Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMedia Influence and HealthSocial Media in Health Education

Educommunication and empowerment in cardiovascular health of Lisbon citizens

Open access
Belim, Célia, Baptista, Raphael, Cruz, Carla, Cunha, Maria João·2024·Comunicar

Abstract

Online educommunication and empowerment are crucial dimensions in awareness, literacy and change processes, and their articulation may bring benefits to cardiovascular health, given that cardiovascular diseases are the deadliest in the world, including in Portugal. This paper aims to explore the relationship between online educommunication and empowerment in cardiovascular health, using Lisbon citizens as a case. The theoretical framework is composed by the interactivity and empowerment model, the health belief model and the uses and gratifications theory. The questionnaire survey was applied to a gender and age quota sample (N=400). The questionnaire includes thematic dimensions, such as online informative practices on cardiovascular health, the eHEALS scale, and the importance and effectiveness of the educommunicative message on cardiovascular health features. Results show that the educommunicative message has characteristics at the level of purpose, content, type, format, emotions, and logic, which enhance it the most. This indicates that exposure to messages with these characteristics may instigate empowerment and behavior change. Respondents self-rated with the most positive levels on the eHEALS scale, showing empowerment at the eHealth level, with age rather than gender differences. There is evidence that eHealth skills and having cardiovascular disease influence information seeking and empowerment. The main contribution lies in identifying characteristics of the cardiovascular health educommunication message that can optimize recipient’s empowerment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.58262/v32i78.9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In health information settings, users pursue gratifications related to reassurance, risk reduction, and practical decision-making by engaging with peer experiences, expert content, or healthcare influencers.

    “In such settings, users pursue gratifications related to reassurance, risk reduction, and practical decision-making by engaging with peer experiences, expert content, or healthcare influencers.”

    From Classic Communication Theories in the Digital Realm: A Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as Belim et al., 2024

  • eHealth literacy intersects with user motivations to seek credible health information through digital platforms.

    “Belim et al. (2024) show how eHealth literacy intersects with user motivations to seek credible health information through digital platforms.”

    From Classic Communication Theories in the Digital Realm: A Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as Belim et al., 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belim, C., Baptista, R., Cruz, C., & Cunha, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Venue
Comunicar
Published
2024-01-16
ISSN
  • 1134-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1988-3293
OpenAlex
W4394565407
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comunicar (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UIDB/04304/2020, UIDP/00713/2020)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
educommunication, health empowerment, cardiovascular health, cardiovascular disease, online health information, digital health literacy, Health Belief Model, uses and gratifications theory, health behavior change, information seeking, age and gender differences, Lisbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review