Plain Persons and Moral Philosophy: Rules, Virtues and Goods
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On MacIntyre's account, the good of the community will be achieved with respect to the good of its members, a good that is for MacIntyre inescapably theological.
“I will note in passing that on MacIntyre's account, the good of the community will be achieved with respect to the good of its members-a good that is, for MacIntyre (1992, 19), inescapably theological.”
From Can a MacIntyrian Care about Severely Disabled Strangers? (2022) · cites this paper as MacIntyre (1992, 19)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can a MacIntyrian Care about Severely Disabled Strangers?
McCracken, G. (2022) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhac029
- Authors
- MacIntyre, A., & Philosophy Documentation Center
- Corresponding author
- MacIntyre, Alasdair
- Venue
- American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-19
- ISSN
- 1051-3558 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325811116
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Catholicism and Religious Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Keywords
- ethics, laypeople, moral theology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
