The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections
Abstract
The current feminist debate over ecology raises important and timely issues about the theoretical adequacy of the four leading versions of feminism-liberal feminism, traditional Marxist feminism, radical feminism, and socialist feminism. In this paper I present a minimal condition account of ecological feminism, or ecofeminism. I argue that if eco-feminism is true or at least plausible, then each of the four leading versions of feminism is inadequate, incomplete, or problematic as a theoretical grounding for eco-feminism. I conclude that, if eco-feminism is to be taken seriously, then a transformative feminism is needed that will move us beyond the four familiar feminist frameworks and make an eco-feminist perspective central to feminist theory and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Nature of Gender: Work, Gender, and Environment
Nightingale, A. (2006) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d01k · Cited by 473
Davis, A. C. (2023) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102730 · Cited by 9
León-Jiménez, F. (2016) · Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político · doi:10.46661/revintpensampolit.1877 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Warren, K. J., & Center for Environmental Philosophy, T. U. O. N. T.
- Venue
- Environmental Ethics
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-20
- ISSN
- 0163-4275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1784021363
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5840/enviroethics19879113
- The paper
- Warren, K. J., & Center for Environmental Philosophy, T. U. O. N. T. (1987). Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections. Environmental Ethics. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19879113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
