Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective Part II

Ennis, Robert, Philosophy Documentation Center·2011·Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines

DOI 10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving
Hou, C., Zhu, G., & Sudarshan, V. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13613 · Cited by 72
Ai-Based Chatbot Interactions and Critical Thinking Skills: An Exploratory Study
Fabio, R. A., Plebe, A., & Suriano, R. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06795-8 · Cited by 49
Naturalizing Critical Thinking: Consequences for Education, Blueprint for Future Research in Cognitive Science
Pasquinelli, E., Farina, M., Bedel, A., & Casati, R. (2021) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12286 · Cited by 29
Scaffolding generative AI as a tutor: A quasi-experimental study of learning outcomes and motivational, cognitive and metacognitive processes
Melanou, C., & Beege, M. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16040651 · Cited by 12
Advocating synergising a critical dialogic approach with competencies-trained dialoguing with GenAI tools to enhance students’ critical thinking and communication competencies
Rahimi, M. (2025) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/vaa8h214 · Cited by 6
Generative AI and Learning Dynamics in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Empirical Study
Melanou, C., Beege, M., & Kimmig, M. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70322 · Cited by 2

Authors: Ennis, R., & Philosophy Documentation Center
Venue: Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines
Publisher: Philosophy Documentation Center
Published: 2011
Volume: 26
Issue: 2
Pages: 5-19
ISSN: 1093-1082
DOI: 10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215
Cited by: 92
References: 0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review