Cited by 29Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Naturalizing Critical Thinking: Consequences for Education, Blueprint for Future Research in Cognitive Science

Open access
Pasquinelli, Elena, Farina, Mathieu, Bedel, Audrey, Casati, Roberto·2021·Mind Brain and Education

Abstract

While very popular in public discourse about education, critical thinking education is still a work in progress. Two key conditions for successfully addressing critical thinking education are lacking: (a) the availability of a clear, specific, and operational definition, and (b) a deeper understanding of the natural cognitive bases of critical thinking. We, therefore, propose a theoretical framework for critical thinking education, grounded on a cognitive approach. Starting from a restrictive characterization of critical thinking—defined as the capacity of evaluating the epistemic quality of information, and of calibrating one's confidence in relationship to it—we identify specific mechanisms subserving critical thinking that are present in early human development. We refer to these mechanisms as the natural building blocks of critical thinking. On this naturalistic ground, effective educational strategies can be envisaged that both harness the natural building blocks of critical thinking and help overcome its shortcomings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mbe.12286

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press.
  2. Einav, S., & Robinson, E. J. (2010). Children's sensitivity to error magnitude when evaluating informants. Cognitive Development, 25(3), 218-232.
  3. Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press.
  4. Mercier, H. (2016). Confirmation bias-Myside bias. In R. Pohl, Cognitive Illusions, 2nd ed. (pp. 99- 114). Psychology Press.
  5. Pasquinelli, E., Farina, M., Bedel, A., Casati, R., 2021, Naturalizing Critical Thinking: Consequences for Education, Blueprint for Future Research in Cognitive Science. Mind, Mind and Education, Volume15, Issue2, 168-176. DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12286 16 · DOI
  6. Pennycook, G. (2017). A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual-process models. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (p. 34). Psychology Press.
  7. Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current biology, 21(23), R941-R945.
  8. In M. J. Beran, J. L. Brandl, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition. Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasquinelli, E., Farina, M., Bedel, A., & Casati, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Fondation La main à la pâte
  • École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR)
Corresponding author
Pasquinelli, Elena
Venue
Mind Brain and Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
168-176
ISSN
  • 1751-2271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-228X
OpenAlex
W3146844643
Cited by
29
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mind Brain and Education (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐18‐CE28‐0018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
critical thinking, critical thinking instruction, cognitive approach, confidence calibration, early human development, theoretical framework, educational strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review