The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Systematicity of Language and Thought
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People also relied on inductive biases that sometimes support the algebraic solution and sometimes deviate from it; people are not purely algebraic machines.
“However, people also relied on inductive biases that sometimes support the algebraic solution and sometimes deviate from it; indeed, people are not purely algebraic machines3,6,7.”
From Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 · Cited by 4,022
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network
Lake, B. M., & Baroni, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06668-3 · Cited by 230
Indirection and symbol-like processing in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia
Kriete, T., Noelle, D. C., Cohen, J. D., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1303547110 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, K., & Journal of Philosophy, I.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Kent
- ORCID
- Johnson, Kent
- Venue
- Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 111-139
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W537815
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- language and thought, systematicity, language acquisition, cognitive development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
