Cited by 40Embodied and Extended CognitionPhenomenology and Existential PhilosophyPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

How embodied cognition is being disembodied

Gallagher, Shaun, TPM: The Philosophers' Magazine·2015·The Philosophers' Magazine

Abstract

Embodied cognition has been reframing our understanding of mind, brain, perception, action, and cognition more generally, since at least the 1990s, following the publication of The Embodied Mind by Varela, Thompson and Rosch. That landmark publication did not appear out of nowhere. It was building on the ongoing work in phenomenological philosophy from the time of Merleau-Ponty. With The Embodied Mind, and a growing number of publications since, the resources found in phenomenology, as well as pragmatism (especially the work of Peirce and Dewey) have now gained a foothold in the cognitive sciences and have been turning some things around in philosophy of mind.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5840/tpm20156819

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to moderate or weak embodied cognition, an agent could easily be simulated from within a vat, provided reasonable simulacra of bodily signals were provided.

    “Indeed, according to moderate (or weak) embodied cognition, such an agent could easily be simulated from within a vat, provided reasonable simulacra of bodily signals were provided.”
  • According to the moderate view, the body is just a better designed container that delivers information to the brain in its own peculiar way, rather than a constitutive element of information processing.

    “According to the moderate view, the body is just “a better designed container that delivers information to the brain in its own peculiar way”, rather than a constitutive element of information processing.”
  • Gallagher's critique describes moderate embodied cognition as an invasion of the body-snatchers that leaves the body out of it, replacing bodies with sanitised body-formatted representations in the brain.

    “Philosopher Shaun Gallagher provides a compelling critique,18 describing ‘moderate embodied cognition’ as an ‘invasion of the body-snatchers’:”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallagher, S., & Magazine, T. T. P.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Gallagher, Shaun
Venue
The Philosophers' Magazine
Published
2015
Issue
68
Pages
96-102
ISSN
1354-814X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328905155
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Philosophers Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
embodied cognition, phenomenology, Merleau-Ponty, pragmatism, Charles Sanders Peirce, John Dewey, philosophy of mind, mind-brain relationship, perception and action, cognitive science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review