Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sharing cities: a case for truly smart and sustainable cities

Open access
·2016·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

de las viejas hegemonías.Esto demuestra que la polis es compleja, precisamente, por sus caracteres diferenciadores y cualidades particulares.El libro aborda dos aspectos cruciales para la consolidación del paradigma colaborativo: la reputación y la confianza.Se trata de una tarea de la que deben ocuparse los promotores de estas iniciativas y en especial, los gestores urbanos.Uno de los retos que las ciudades colaborativas tienen es generar la empatía entre los stakeholders para entender, y sobre todo, valorar, la intención prosocial que tienen estos modelos, así como la forma en la que dibujan oportunidades para el emprendimiento, la innovación y el compromiso con la cultura sustentable.Resulta necesario que todo aquel actor que se ocupe del presente y futuro de la ciudad, revise este libro y devele las claves para entender una nueva ciudadanía y su capacidad transformadora.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.196144

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2016-05-24
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
53-4355-53-4355
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2343100864
Cited by
324
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sharing cities: a case for truly smart and sustainable cities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.196144
The paper
Sharing cities: a case for truly smart and sustainable cities. (2016). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.196144

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.