The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recreating motherhood: ideology and technology in a patriarchal society
Abstract
The author advocates a social policy for dealing with mothers and motherhood that is consistent with feminist politics and feminist theory. She suggests how to incorporate technological and scientific advances into social policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1991) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.001523 · Cited by 614
The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression
Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90228-3 · Cited by 324
‘It May Be Her Eggs But It’s My Blood’: surrogates and everyday forms of kinship in India
Pande, A. (2009) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/s11133-009-9138-0 · Cited by 209
Reclaiming a moral identity: stillbirth, stigma and ‘moral mothers
Murphy, S. (2012) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.06.005 · Cited by 66
Anleu (1992) · doi:10.1177/089124392006001003 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1989-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 27-0611-27-0611
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2076011416
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recreating motherhood: ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.27-0611
- The paper
- Recreating motherhood: ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. (1989). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-0611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
