The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow
Abstract
A rich and full exploration of the myriad of instances where a mourner is deprived of the catharsis shared grief brings. Provides numerous interventions designed to help patients recognize and explore their loss, and find meaningful and appropriate ways to resolve their grief.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss
Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N. R. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2 · Cited by 1,408
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 685
Caring for a relative with dementia: family caregiver burden
Papastavrou, E., Kalokerinou, A., Papacostas, S. S., Tsangari, H., & Sourtzi, P. (2007) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04250.x · Cited by 540
Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221 · Cited by 513
Doka, K. J. (1999) · Bereavement Care · doi:10.1080/02682629908657467 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1990-02-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 27-3546-27-3546
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2033271051
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.27-3546
- The paper
- Disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. (1990). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-3546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
