The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecological experiments: purpose, design, and execution
Abstract
Ecological Experiments stresses the importance to ecology of field experiments, where variables are manipulated in order to collect data on specific hypotheses, as opposed to the more passive observational method. The book begins by introducing a series of ecological questions that can be addressed experimentally for example, what is the significance of competition among species? The minimal requirements of experimental design that must be met are then introduced, together with examples of good and poor experiments from the ecological literature and a consideration of the trade-offs that may be forced on the experimenter by field conditions. All ecologists, and especially students beginning their careers in field study, will find in this text a good introduction to the experimental foundation of ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme
Westoby, M. (1998) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004327224729 · Cited by 1,925
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Huston, M. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050180 · Cited by 1,772
Functional Equivalency Trajectories of the Restored Gog‐Le‐Hi‐Te Estuarine Wetland
Simenstad, C. A., & Thom, R. M. (1996) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/2269551 · Cited by 253
Chapter 23 The Madison Headwaters Elk Herd
Garrott, R. A., White, P. J., & Rotella, J. J. (2008) · Terrestrial Ecology · doi:10.1016/s1936-7961(08)00223-6 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1990-07-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 27-6328-27-6328
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2032792517
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological experiments: purpose, design, and execution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.27-6328
- The paper
- Ecological experiments: purpose, design, and execution. (1990). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-6328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.