The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology
Abstract
Brief biographies. Acknowledgements. Part 1. Feminist Praxis and the Academic Mode 1. Feminist praxis and the academic mode of production: an editorial introduction Liz Stanley 2. Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes Liz Stanley and Sue Wise Part 2. Feminist Research Processes 3. Introduction Section A. Beginning and Finishing Research 4. The feminist research process - defining a topic Jane Haggis 5. The history of a 'failed' research topic: the case of the childminders Fiona Poland Section B. Demolishing the 'Quantitative v. Qualitative' Divide 6. 'Seeking Susan': producing statistical information on young people's leisure Denise Farran 7. My statistics and feminism - a true story Anne Pugh 8. 'A referral was made': behind the scenes during the creation of a Social Services Department 'elderly' statistic Liz Stanley Section C. Recognising the Role of Auto/Biography 9. On the conflicts of doing feminist research into masculinity Jocye Layland 10. From butch god to teddy bear? Some thoughts on my relationship with Elvis Presley Sue Wise 11. The professional and the personal: a study of women quantity surveyors Clara Geed Section D. Analytically Using Experience 12. Breaking the rules: assessing the assessment of a girls' project Fiona Poland 13. The mastectomy experience Ann Tait 14. At the Palace: researching gender and ethnicity in a Chinese restaurant Chung Yuen Kay 15. Counter arguments: an ethnographic look at 'Women and Class' Sue Webb 16. Using drama to get at gender Vivienne Griffiths 17. Becoming a feminist social worker Sue Wise Section E. Analysing Written and Visual Texts 18. Reading feminism in fieldnotes Anne Williams 19. Analysing a photograph of Marilyn Monroe Denise Farran. Name index. Subject index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parasites, Pawns and Partners: Disability Research and the Role of Non-Disabled Researchers
Stone, E., & Priestley, M. (1996) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591081 · Cited by 438
Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: a story seeking consideration
Sparkes, A. C. (2007) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794107082306 · Cited by 371
On Auto/Biography in Sociology
Stanley, L. (1993) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803859302700105 · Cited by 313
The researcher/interviewer in intercultural context: a social intruder!
Shah, S. (2004) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/0141192042000237239 · Cited by 213
Whose voices? Whose knowledge? A feminist analysis of the value of key informant interviews
Lokot, M. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920948775 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 28-1839-28-1839
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1972142830
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.28-1839
- The paper
- Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. (1990). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-1839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.