The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Auto/Biography in Sociology
Abstract
The specification of temporal origins for biography and autobiography — typically within the Enlightenment or modernism — that appear in sociological discussion are interrogated through discussing two parallel sites of origin. The first is Merton's discussion of `sociological autobiography', the second the feminist concern with reflexivity within sociological research processes. Both are related to the notion of `auto/biography'. `Auto/biography' disrupts conventional taxonomies of life writing, disputing its divisions of self/other, public/private, and immediacy/memory. Relatedly, `the auto/biographical I' signals the active inquiring presence of sociologists in constructing, rather than discovering, knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,154
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative
Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1975) · New Literary History · doi:10.2307/468419 · Cited by 1,490
Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge
Merton, R. K. (1972) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225294 · Cited by 1,467
Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1839 · Cited by 469
Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M. M. (1986) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.1986.tb00073.x · Cited by 463
Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1202 · Cited by 331
The Polish: Peasant in Europe and America
Fernandes, F. (1960) · Revista de Antropologia · doi:10.11606/2179-0892.ra.1960.110574 · Cited by 160
The diaries of Hannah Cullwick
Cullwick, H., & Stanley, L. (1984) · Virago eBooks · Cited by 27
Self-citationDoing Ethnography, Writing Ethnography: A Comment on Hammersley
Stanley, L. (1990) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038590024004004 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Cited by
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
Where do I belong?: Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality
Anthias, F. (2002) · Ethnicities · doi:10.1177/14687968020020040301 · Cited by 470
Running, Being, and Beijing—An Existential Exploration of a Runner Identity
Ronkainen, N. J., Harrison, M. E., & Ryba, T. V. (2014) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.810796 · Cited by 26
And still we rise: stories of resilience and transgression
Housee, S., & Richards, E. (2011) · Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences · doi:10.11120/elss.2011.03030006 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, L.
- Venue
- Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-52
- ISSN
- 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8684
- OpenAlex
- W2064555560
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 122.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Auto/Biography in Sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/003803859302700105
- The paper
- Stanley, L. (1993). On Auto/Biography in Sociology. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803859302700105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.