The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science
Open accessAbstract
"Funded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ... through Contract 68-C8-0006 to NSI Technology Services, Corp., and Contract CR-814298-01-0 to the Association of State Wetland Managers"--Vol. 1, p. ii.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries
Kennish, M. J. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892902000061 · Cited by 1,317
Gómez‐Aparicio, L. (2009) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01573.x · Cited by 512
The Role of Reference Wetlands in Functional Assessment and Mitigation
Brinson, M. M., & Rheinhardt, R. (1996) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/2269553 · Cited by 326
Evaluating stream restoration projects
Kondolf, G. M., & Micheli, E. R. (1995) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf02471999 · Cited by 323
Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: A review
Barrat-Segretain, M. H. (1996) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00044885 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1991-04-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 28-4510-28-4510
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1525914115
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.28-4510
- The paper
- Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. (1991). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-4510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
