The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries
Abstract
Estuaries exhibit a wide array of human impacts that can compromise their ecological integrity, because of rapid population growth and uncontrolled development in many coastal regions worldwide. Long-term environmental problems plaguing estuaries require remedial actions to improve the viability and health of these valuable coastal systems. Detailed examination of the effects of pollution inputs, the loss and alteration of estuarine habitat, and the role of other anthropogenic stress indicates that water quality in estuaries, particularly urbanized systems, is often compromised by the overloading of nutrients and organic matter, the influx of pathogens, and the accumulation of chemical contaminants. In addition, the destruction of fringing wetlands and the loss and alteration of estuarine habitats usually degrade biotic communities. Estuaries are characterized by high population densities of microbes, plankton, benthic flora and fauna, and nekton; however, these organisms tend to be highly vulnerable to human activities in coastal watersheds and adjoining embayments. Trends suggest that by 2025 estuaries will be most significantly impacted by habitat loss and alteration associated with a burgeoning coastal population, which is expected to approach six billion people. Habitat destruction has far reaching ecological consequences, modifying the structure, function, and controls of estuarine ecosystems and contributing to the decline of biodiversity. Other anticipated high priority problems are excessive nutrient and sewage inputs to estuaries, principally from land-based sources. These inputs will lead to the greater incidence of eutrophication as well as hypoxia and anoxia. During the next 25 years, overfishing is expected to become a more pervasive and significant anthropogenic factor, also capable of mediating global-scale change to estuaries. Chemical contaminants, notably synthetic organic compounds, will remain a serious problem, especially in heavily industrialized areas. Freshwater diversions appear to be an emerging global problem as the expanding coastal population places greater demands on limited freshwater supplies for agricultural, domestic, and industrial needs. Altered freshwater flows could significantly affect nutrient loads, biotic community structure, and the trophodynamics of estuarine systems. Ecological impacts that will be less threatening, but still damaging, are those caused by introduced species, sea level rise, coastal subsidence, and debris/litter. Although all of these disturbances can alter habitats and contribute to shifts in the composition of estuarine biotic communities, the overall effect will be partial changes to these ecosystem components. Several strategies may mitigate future impacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems
Smith, V. H., Tilman, G. D., & Nekola, J. C. (1999) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00091-3 · Cited by 3,080
Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns
Nixon, S. W. (1995) · Ophelia · doi:10.1080/00785236.1995.10422044 · Cited by 2,672
Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms
Cariton, J. T., & Geller, J. B. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.261.5117.78 · Cited by 1,624
Granéli, E., Sundström, B., Edler, L., & Anderson, D. M. (1987) · Cited by 1,545
The Effects of Fishing on Marine Ecosystems
Jennings, S., & Kaiser, M. J. (1998) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60212-6 · Cited by 1,502
Bryan, G. W., & Langston, W. J. (1992) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/0269-7491(92)90099-v · Cited by 1,493
Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae
Hallegraeff, G. M., Anderson, D. M., & Cembella, A. D. (2003) · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · Cited by 1,432
McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N., Dokken, D. J., & White, K. S. (2001) · Cited by 1,284
Accelerating Invasion Rate in a Highly Invaded Estuary
Cohen, A. N., & Carlton, J. T. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5350.555 · Cited by 1,172
Valiela, I. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4125-4 · Cited by 1,117
Cited by
The Rising Threat of Atmospheric CO2: A Review on the Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies
Nunes, L. J. R. (2023) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments10040066 · Cited by 587
Weinstein, J. E., Crocker, B. K., & Gray, A. D. (2016) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.3432 · Cited by 553
Microplastic in two South Carolina Estuaries: occurrence, distribution, and composition
Gray, A. D., Wertz, H., Leads, R. R., & Weinstein, J. E. (2018) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.030 · Cited by 339
Armitage, A. R., Frankovich, T. A., Heck, K. L., & Fourqurean, J. W. (2005) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02693924 · Cited by 118
Habitat change in the lower Columbia River estuary, 1870–2009
Marcoe, K., & Pilson, S. (2017) · Journal of Coastal Conservation · doi:10.1007/s11852-017-0523-7 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennish, M. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Conservation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-107
- ISSN
- 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4387
- OpenAlex
- W2158345841
- Cited by
- 1,317
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0376892902000061
- The paper
- Kennish, M. J. (2002). Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environmental Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892902000061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.