The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The rhetoric of immediacy: a cultural critique of Chan/Zen Buddhism
Abstract
Through a highly sensitive exploration of key concepts and metaphors, Bernard Faure guides Western readers in appreciating some of the more elusive aspects of the Chinese tradition of Chan Buddhism and its outgrowth, Japanese Zen. He focuses on Chan's insistence on immediacy--its denial of all traditional mediations, including scripture, ritual, good works--and yet shows how these mediations have always been present in Chan. Given this apparent duplicity in its discourse, Faure reveals how Chan structures its practice and doctrine on such mental paradigms as mediacy/immediacy, sudden/gradual, and center/margins.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Robert Sharf and Bernard Faure have detailed the historical foundations and central importance that mummies played in the premodern period (especially within the Chan tradition)”
From Relic Wary : Facets of Buddhist Relic Veneration in East Asia and Recent Scholarship (2017) · cites this paper as Faure 1991, 132ff
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience
Sharf, R. (1995) · Numen · doi:10.1163/1568527952598549 · Cited by 394
Death and Demonization of a Bodhisattva: Guanyin's Reformulation within Chinese Religion
Meulenbeld, M. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfv104 · Cited by 12
Brushes with Some “Dirty Truths”: Handwritten Manuscripts and Religion in China
Robson, J. (2012) · History of Religions · doi:10.1086/664721 · Cited by 9
Pregnant Metaphor: Embryology, Embodiment, and the Ends of Figurative Imagery in Chinese Buddhism
Buckelew, K. (2018) · Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies · doi:10.1353/jas.2018.0028 · Cited by 4
McBride, R. D. (2020) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2020.1763677 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 29-6238-29-6238
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1499476049
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 13
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Zen Buddhism, immediacy, mediation (cultural/media theory), sudden and gradual enlightenment, center and margin, Buddhist doctrine, Buddhist practice, metaphor, Chinese Buddhism, Japanese Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rhetoric of immediacy: a cultural critique of Chan/Zen Buddhism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.29-6238
- The paper
- The rhetoric of immediacy: a cultural critique of Chan/Zen Buddhism. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-6238